Navita Goyal

@navitagoyal.bsky.social

PhD student @umdcs, Member of @ClipUmd lab | Earlier @AdobeResearch, @IITRoorkee

📣 We are organizing the first InterpScience Workshop @ NeurIPS 2026 in Sydney! The goal of the workshop is to build a more rigorous scientific foundation of LLM interpretability. 📝 Papers due: Aug 28 🌐 interpscience.github.io ✉️ interpscience@gmail.com [1/7]

Interpretability as a Science · Workshop

What can interpretability learn from other sciences? A NeurIPS 2026 workshop toward rigorous foundations for understanding LLMs.

interpscience.github.io

Thrilled to share that I am joining UC Berkeley as an Assistant Professor in the School of Information! I start in Fall 2027, and I am recruiting PhD students this cycle. List me in your application if you want to work with me! More on what I'm looking for (and a form to indicate interest) 🧵

Image of the UC Berkeley campus

Thanks WiAIR (@wiair.bsky.social‬) for featuring my work on your YouTube channel. Watch the video to hear about our work on inference-time steering — and why these interventions LLMs may not be as “precise” as they look.

Women in AI Research - WiAIR@wiair.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Another video in the #WiAIR_podcast at #EACL2026 series. @j-novikova-nlp.bsky.social speaks with @navitagoyal.bsky.social about her paper: "Steering Safely or Off a Cliff? Rethinking Specificity and Robustness in Inference-Time Interventions" 🎥 Watch it here: youtu.be/q42bUeh1KyA

My lab at BU is recruiting PhD students and possibly a postdoc this year! We study humans & machines, centered around topics like meaning, generalization, evaluation methods and design, and the nature of computation and representation that underlie language and cognition. 🫴🫴

Bild

Interested in interpretability, data attribution, evaluation, and similar topics? Interested in doing a postdoc with me? Apply to the prestigious Azrieli program! Link below 👇 DMs are open (email is good too!)

I am recruiting PhD students to start in 2026! If you are interested in robustness, training dynamics, interpretability for scientific understanding, or the science of LLM analysis you should apply. BU is building a huge LLM analysis/interp group and you’ll be joining at the ground floor.

Naomi Saphra@nsaphra.bsky.social · last yr.

Life update: I'm starting as faculty at Boston University @bucds.bsky.social in 2026! BU has SCHEMES for LM interpretability & analysis, I couldn't be more pumped to join a burgeoning supergroup w/ @najoung.bsky.social @amuuueller.bsky.social. Looking for my first students, so apply and reach out!

CDS building which looks like a jenga tower

I'll be presenting this work with @rachelrudinger at #NAACL2025 tomorrow (Wednesday 4/30) in Albuquerque during Session C (Oral/Poster 2) at 2pm! 🔬 Decomposing hypotheses in traditional NLI and defeasible NLI helps us measure various forms of consistency of LLMs. Come join us!

Bild

Have work on the actionable impact of interpretability findings? Consider submitting to our Actionable Interpretability workshop at ICML! See below for more info. Website: actionable-interpretability.github.io Deadline: May 9

Mor Geva@megamor2.bsky.social · last yr.

🎉 Our Actionable Interpretability workshop has been accepted to #ICML2025! 🎉 > Follow @actinterp.bsky.social > Website actionable-interpretability.github.io @talhaklay.bsky.social @anja.re @mariusmosbach.bsky.social @sarah-nlp.bsky.social @iftenney.bsky.social Paper submission deadline: May 9th!

Thinking about paying $20k/month for a "PhD-level AI agent"? You might want to wait until their web browsing skills are on par with those of human PhD students 😛 Check out our new BEARCUBS benchmark, which shows web agents struggle to perform simple multimodal browsing tasks!

Yixiao Song@yixiaosong.bsky.social · last yr.

Introducing 🐻 BEARCUBS 🐻, a “small but mighty” dataset of 111 QA pairs designed to assess computer-using web agents in multimodal interactions on the live web! ✅ Humans achieve 85% accuracy ❌ OpenAI Operator: 24% ❌ Anthropic Computer Use: 14% ❌ Convergence AI Proxy: 13%

🚨 New Position Paper 🚨 Multiple choice evals for LLMs are simple and popular, but we know they are awful 😬 We complain they're full of errors, saturated, and test nothing meaningful, so why do we still use them? 🫠 Here's why MCQA evals are broken, and how to fix them 🧵

Bild

How can we generate synthetic data for a task that requires global reasoning over a long context (e.g., verifying claims about a book)? LLMs aren't good at *solving* such tasks, let alone generating data for them. Check out our paper for a compression-based solution!

Chau Minh Pham@chautmpham.bsky.social · last yr.

⚠️Current methods for generating instruction-following data fall short for long-range reasoning tasks like narrative claim verification. We present CLIPPER ✂️, a compression-based pipeline that produces grounded instructions for ~$0.5 each, 34x cheaper than human annotations.

This paper is really cool. They decompose NLI (and defeasible NLI) hypotheses into atoms, and then use these atoms to measure the logical consistency of LLMs. E.g. for an entailment NLI example, each hypothesis atom should also be entailed by the premise. Very nice idea 👏👏

Bild

This is my first time serving as an AC for a big conference. Just read this great work by Goyal et al. arxiv.org/abs/2411.11437 I'm optimizing for high coverage and low redundancy—assigning reviewers based on relevant topics or affinity scores alone feels off. Seniority and diversity matter!

Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing

A large host of scientific journals and conferences solicit peer reviews from multiple reviewers for the same submission, aiming to gather a broader range of perspectives and mitigate individual biase...

arxiv.org