Amanda Lotz

@drtvlotz.bsky.social

Reimaginer of media industries and society in digital age | Prof@QUT | Strategy consultant | US expat | Fan of swimming, baked goods & nature | drtvlotz@gmail | amandalotz.com | Mostly writing on LinkedIn, glimmers of also being a human here

It’s been so inspiring to see the growth of data center opposition across the US and the wider world. Taking on the tech industry is bringing communities together — which seems like exactly what we need right now.

Tech Won’t Save Us@techwontsave.us · last mo.

Across the United States, communities are uniting in opposition to data centers to power generative AI. This week Saul Levin joins @parismarx.com to talk about those fights and how they center on tangible issues that bring people together. Full ep: techwontsave.us/episode/334_...

I'm so confused by Australia's embrace of data centres. A long read by @news.abc.net.au last week noted no downside, gov't is treating the opportunity to build them as a gift? Meanwhile opposition, mostly due to toxic effects in communities with them, has managed to UNITE folks in the US.

Data for Progress@dataforprogress.org · last mo.

NEW: A majority of voters across party lines support a data center moratorium. Sixty-seven percent of Democrats, 66% of Independents, and 58% of Republicans support pausing the construction of new AI data centers for at least one year.

Bar chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: Voters Support a Data Center Moratorium.
Description: Some lawmakers have proposed pausing the construction of new artificial intelligence (AI) data centers for at least one year. Do you support or oppose this proposal?
Response Options:
A) I support this proposal. The U.S. should pause the construction of new AI data centers for at least one year.
B) Don't know
C) I oppose this proposal. The U.S. should continue constructing new AI data centers.
All likely voters — 63% chose A, 11% chose B, 26% chose C
Democrat — 67% chose A, 10% chose B, 23% chose C
Independent / Third party — 66% chose A, 11% chose B, 24% chose C
Republican — 58% chose A, 11% chose B, 31% chose C

June 12–16, 2026 survey of 1,090 U.S. likely voters.

Or maybe it is time to look back at what decades of media studies research says about watching video? Pretty big body of work would counter the framing of this as passive. Maybe a lot of 'social media' use was never 'social'? Maybe a lot is driven by our interests rather than imagined community?

Petter Törnberg@pettertornberg.com · 3mo ago

Social media is no longer social. Most of it is passive viewing of videos and pictures from people we've never met. But we're still studying social media like it's 2010. We've entered the post-social media era — and research needs to catch up. osf.io/preprints/so... preprint w/ Richard Rogers

In testimony last week, Sarandos reported 86 million US Netflix subscribers. At 86m US subs, Netflix reaches 69% of US households – a lot relative to other services. But per the recent Netflix global subs numbers, that also means the US accounts for only 28% of Netflix’s subscriber base. 1/2

This new article brings the current dynamics of the ‘creator economy’ (hosted distribution) into conversation with decades of explaining how creative autonomy is constrained in commercial mediamaking. This lets us explore how the ‘creator’ sector encompasses journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

On hosted media, simple-professional cultural production, and micro media logics in anglophone video - Amanda D. Lotz, 2025

The media sector has expanded in the 21st century to encompass a ‘hosted model’ of circulation and ‘simple-professional’ dynamic of cultural production that coe...

journals.sagepub.com