Marcus Luther

@marcusluther.bsky.social

HS English teacher clinging to what the legendary Gwendolyn Brooks wrote: "we are each other's / harvest:" (yes, that line break feels heavier than ever these days) Also: I share writings, resources + thoughts on education at thebrokencopier.substack.com!

I think this is important for faculty to recognize. It is absolutely possible to promote academic integrity without using AI detectors, TurnItIn, or similar products. They are not the only way.

It is hard to put into words the impact that teaching expertise makes when people step into leadership roles in education. But I think everyone sees it and everyone feels it. And I wish it was more of a priority.

This really resonates as the skill I’d want to cultivate in novice T’s as an intention: “Eventually, each teacher builds a repertoire of things to notice and a larger pool of ways to respond.” We need to name the repertoire/pool for novices to help them begin naming those things for themselves.

Maybe the most important lesson the past several years have offered in education is that, far more often than not, efficiency is the opposite of presence. Yes, we tell ourselves that if we’re efficient with A then we’ll be more present with B. But if we’re honest with ourselves…

"Experience has taught me that responsiveness isn’t abandoning the plan. Responsiveness is teaching the students who showed up in class rather than who I imagined when I wrote the lesson." 🎯 🎯 🎯 Imagine if we designed schools for this type of responsiveness?

excerpt from article linked in reply

I've had MANY conversations with students who see this in themselves and friends: "persistence is reduced because AI conditions people to expect immediate answers thereby denying them the experience of working through challenges on their own." Arguments re: how could be used ≠ how it is being used.

We posit that persistence is reduced because
AI conditions people to expect immediate answers, thereby denying them the experience
of working through challenges on their own. These results add to the growing literature
on cognitive offloading and AI-induced deskilling, and suggest the need for AI model
development to prioritize scaffolding long-term competence alongside immediate task
completion.
Coach Finstock@coachfinstock.bsky.social · 4d ago

You can lie to yourself every day that this horseshit doesn't make you lazy and stupid, but reality comes at you pretty fast

The other thing I'd add: hearing a classroom teacher talk about classroom management and what works is so much different than hearing someone who is no longer in the classroom share these same strategies. There's an authenticity to this @edutopia.org conversation—and that matters. (A lot!)

Marcus Luther@marcusluther.bsky.social · 4d ago

1. I'm walking into school on Monday with several students I'm going to use the 2x10 strategy with—it's gold. (Especially in October!) 2. Listening to this episode/reflecting on your classroom is about as good as it gets when it comes to PD. (Especially in October!)

1. I'm walking into school on Monday with several students I'm going to use the 2x10 strategy with—it's gold. (Especially in October!) 2. Listening to this episode/reflecting on your classroom is about as good as it gets when it comes to PD. (Especially in October!)

Tyler Rablin@mrrablin.bsky.social · 5d ago

This was a more emotional recording for me than I expected. We like to make classroom management sound so straightforward, but the reality is that we are complex beings working with a room of complex beings, and sometimes that’s lovely and other times so very hard. www.edutopia.org/podcast/9-si...

It’s been almost 20 yrs, but I remember using Apples-to-Apples to teach something about language, when this quiet and aloof kid, responding to the target word “fresh,” played his card “beets.” After a couple minutes of wondering silence, he goes, “What? My beets is fresh.” Brought the house down

Marcus Luther@marcusluther.bsky.social · 4d ago

Funny thing is: several years later and I remember that exact moment like it was yesterday—who said it, who else was in that classroom, how immediately/comprehensively we all melted down. What I don't remember: what the exit ticket data was from that lesson. 🤷‍♂️ (And I think that's the point?)

Spent nearly an hour today reading through a collection of different surveys: anonymous check-in responses, peer nominations, group discussion results. It was one of the most meaningful hours I've had as a teacher this year in getting to sit with what students said and prepare responses.

as a HS teacher, I will admit: I believe there is important ”thinking“ that happens in timed, in-class writing—especially compared to what happens within the distracted, over-scheduled lives of students outside of class. there are limitations! But there also is a lot of good.

Jane Rosenzweig@janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 5d ago

This. If we see writing as a way to "assess" students, blue books may seem like a solution. But if the "problem" that writing was solving was helping students think through a problem or question, weigh evidence, read widely, figure out what they think, then blue books don't work and students lose.