Ana Dodik

@anadodik.bsky.social

Graphics & Society @ MIT CSAIL. Prev. Meta, Disney Research. Yugo girl, mother of a half-dog, half-tornado, and a baby seal. 🐶🐶 she/her 🌈🌹

Charles Babbage intentionally designed the computer as an automation of mental labor. Today, computer graphics automates visual art production via privately governed generative models. How did we get here? Critical Labor History of Generative Models, SIGGRAPH Talks '26 🧵

I feel like you could make a fairly robust classifier of how old a SIGGRAPH paper is using the cost of ink required to print it as the only feature dimension.

Come to my talk at SIGGRAPH to find out what the field of Platform Studies says about generative models! "Critical Labor History of Generative Models" Tuesday, 5:05 PM, Room 403 A AI Reflections Session

Slide with political AI slop images on it, saying "Critical Labor History of Generative Models -- Ana Dodik".

There's no way this VAR thing is accurate enough to catch someone being offside with their knee, right? Almost certain there are no body pose estimators that precise in such uncontrolled conditions. Why aren't they integrating uncertainty in the estimates?

Arrived to beautiful Saint Malo for the Curves and Surfaces conference! Let me know if you wanna chat about curves OR surfaces. Or heck, even volumes, why not, let's get nutty with it!

We are excited to announce the 2026 cohort of Rising Stars in Computer Graphics 🌟 These 9 young researchers will participate in a workshop at Siggraph 2026, about the wide range of career trajectories in graphics. Thank you to all applicants and to our selection committee for all the hard work.

Bild

Wish there was a way to donate the SIGGRAPH conference registration discount to help bring in more folks from underrepresented communities if none of the authors can make use of it. I have two that are about to go to waste :(

Been playing around with vibe coding for a few days and it really takes away any joy building software had. It's awe inspiring how quickly it can get something going, but after that point it's just a slog. Feeling depressed about the whole enterprise and the world broadly after the experience.

Puzzled by the trend in the humanities of picking and hyper fixating on one mathematical component of Gen AI and reading into it like tea leaves. In an attempt to demystify models, they mystify themselves with the math. Mathstification, if you will.

This DLSS stuff is what you get when you view art as a metric to optimize, when you reify the most human of endeavors into a force of nature to be studied, to be dominated. You cannot fix another person's art because art isn't a number in a table to improve upon.

One of our dogs starts barking like crazy if someone knocks on anything and I've realized I have developed a stress response any time I hear a knock now, even when she's not around. I think my dog inverse Pavloved me.

The ACM Digital Library, where a LOT of computing-related research is published (I'd say at least 75% of my own publications), is now not only providing (without consent of the authors and without opt-in by readers) AI-generated summaries of papers, but they appear as the *default* over abstracts.

Screenshot of a paper entry:
Fictional Failures and Real-World Lessons: Ethical Speculation Through Design Fiction on Emotional Support Conversational AI
Authors: Faye Kollig, Jessica Pater, Fayika Farhat Nova, Casey Fiesler
(There are tabs with "abstract" and "summary" and "summary" is selected.)

Tired of senior folks dragging people's posters on socials. Has contentification cooked our sociality so much? Consider alternatives: 1. In-person feedback. 2. Broadly construed feedback. 3. Make resources. 4. Post positive examples. 5. Censor the name. 6. Laugh about it in a groupchat if you must.