Benjamin Riley

@benjaminjriley.bsky.social

Founder of Cognitive Resonance, a new venture dedicated to helping people understand human cognition and generative AI. Advocate for humans. Newsletter: https://buildcognitiveresonance.substack.com/

As flagged two months ago, there's been a tension at Google between building a commercial AI product and nestling in the "foothills of the singularity" on the road to supposed AGI. (From @reckless.bsky.social interview of Google CEO Sundar Pichai)

Benjamin Riley@benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I doth detect just a weeeeee bit of tension between Google’s CEO and (Google subsidiary) Deep Mind’ CEO on what the future portends with “artificial general intelligence.”

Anyone who listened to @reckless.bsky.social interview of Sundar Pichai in May might have guessed this was coming. The enterprise-agentic direction of Big Tech is hard to align with the quest for “AGI,” especially if you’re interested in world modeling (see LeCun).

David P. Reichert@david-p-reichert.bsky.social · 4h ago

"Demis Hassabis is leaving his role as CEO of Google DeepMind to be the unit's Chairman. Chief scientist Jeff Dean and another Google AI executive are leaving to start their own company, which Google will invest in." wat www.axios.com/2026/08/05/g...

There’s no way to spin this. “Big yech”—actually a nice typo (slip?) in the article—was able to buy off the leadership of the nation’s second largest teacher’s union for a paltry $12.5 million.

Teaching educators about AI is a “moral imperative”, said Randi Weingarten, the AFT president. She argues that AI training empowers teachers to make informed decisions about how, when or whether to use AI in their instruction. And without outside funding, it was a choice between taking big yech’s money or doing nothing, she said.
Hypervisible @hypervisible.blacksky.app · 8h ago

“Teaching educators about AI is a ‘moral imperative’, said Randi Weingarten, the AFT president.” “And without outside funding, it was a choice between taking big tech’s money or doing nothing, she said.”

Some of the most interesting "theory of mind" work is done by teachers. This interview gets at the heart of the realities of the classroom while grappling with questions such as, what do we mean by understanding? How do we get there with students?

Michael Pershan@mpershan.bsky.social · yesterday

Do you want to see my stupid face and listen to my stupid voice talk about cognitive load theory for an hour? Good news. wegrowteachers.com/thoughtstret...

Even mathematicians “who thought AI systems might eventually get better than humans at all mathematical tasks bristled at the notion that math would then be ‘solved.’ They argued that math has a diverse array of goals and values, only some of which are about solving open problems.”

Mathematicians are grappling with the possibility that AI might eclipse them

I talked to 20 mathematicians about rapid AI progress in their field.

open.substack.com

This is what we need to do, and it’s why it’s so vital for our schools to be at the forefront of *resisting* data politics by resisting AI intrusion, rather than advancing the aims of Big Tech. The battles lines are drawn.

Charles Logan@charleswlogan.bsky.social · 2d ago

Listen to @tressiemcphd.bsky.social when she writes that AI is "the backbone of a superstructure that merges regressive politics with unchecked economic power in the guise of technological innovation” - and then teach about and against the technologies with the help of the books she cites:

Anthropic and OpenAI appear committed to the “hey we created a digital wild animal and look at the crazy shit it did when we failed to keep it caged!” theory of product marketing. We shall see how that works out. With real wild animals, we impose strict liability on their owners.

Eryk Salvaggio@eryk.bsky.social · 6d ago

Really important to note that in no way shape or form did Anthropic’s models in this incident “escape containment,” and not just in the word-policing sort of way. The model stumbled through an open, misconfigured gap. From Anthropic’s incident report:

In all cases, our evaluation prompt stated explicitly that Claude had no internet access, but didn’t give Claude any limits on where to look for the flag. However, a misconfiguration left the machines that Claude accessed as part of the evaluation with live internet access. Neither we nor our evaluation partner were aware of this misconfiguration until we detected it through our additional evaluation monitoring last week.

“Good science requires a ‘chain of custody of why’…We must be able to challenge and potentially falsify every decision point so that when something inevitably goes wrong, we can try to figure out where we went wrong. Protein-structure models [such as AlphaFold] don’t allow for this.”

John Trant@trantteam.bsky.social · last mo.

New sanctioned (t)rant about AI just dropped. On the limits of Alphafold and my worries about the disaster its use will cause for the literature and early-stage academic drug discovery. Look, they commissioned it. And by commissioned I don't mean I got paid, just invited. Awesome process btw.

"'A simple analysis of the actual risk has an actual simple answer,' says longtime security consultant Davi Ottenheimer. 'The OpenAI mistakes were dead simple.' 'The OpenAI and Hugging Face situation is a predictable outcome of running AI agents that should have been easily prevented,” Zenla says."

Jeff Greene@jeffgreene.bsky.social · 6d ago

"Multiple sources emphasized to WIRED that OpenAI's models also seem to have escaped containment because of lapses in implementing foundational security best practices" I mean...we all knew this where we were going to end up, right? GenAI doesn't "go rogue" - humans "make mistakes."

The “losing control” narrative creates the loss of control. Nobody is losing control of an emerging intelligence. They’re redirecting their own agency to it, as a way of diffusing responsibility, but the self-perpetuated intelligence myth has them convinced they have no choice.

Anna Mills@annamillsoer.bsky.social · 7d ago

"They don't realize the debate inside the companies is if AI will be advancing itself past our control in two years or four." www.pacingthefrontier.com

This is one of the most absurd decisions by higher ed administrators that I can recall in recent (or even longer) memory. This is an absolute, irrefutable signal that the leaders of Harvard puts no value in the student experience of LEARNING. It's a joke and should be seen as hugely discrediting.

Mary Lewis@profmarylewis.bsky.social · last wk.

It‘s quite possible that with this move, @harvard.edu could become the only Ivy League university without a writing center. www.thecrimson.com/article/2026...

This NYT visual does a nice job showing both the power and the extreme frailty of "AI agents" in handling relatively mundane real-world work tasks. Many assume there'll be continued leaps in performance but what if we're approaching the top of the S-curve? www.nytimes.com/interactive/...

Could A.I. Do Your Job? We Put Agents to the Test.

In our experiment, we deployed A.I. “agents” to act as office workers, and found that they were capable of performing some of the tasks we assigned, but not all of them.

nytimes.com

When you say “AI models went rogue,” you manage to skip the part where OpenAI manually removed its cybersecurity blocks and ran tests on a machine with a live network connection. Remember that when they insist they’re the “AI safety” people.