Ashlynne

@ovyerus.com

Hopeful IS punk AF she/her 🏳️‍⚧️ 🏳️‍🌈 🇦🇺 | 25 | neurodivergent open source advocate, working on atproto music: @comet.sh (bit of an audio nerd) #solarpunk #hopepunk

The semantic drift of “AI psychosis” from “break with reality exacerbated or caused by sycophantic chatbots” to “person with strong feelings about AI which are not the same as the strong feelings of AI held by the speaker” is bad

if openai did basically the same kind of training *except* they were a bit less sketchy about trying to weasel their way around the "don't train on my shit" checkbox, & was an institution controlled by the public, accessible as a public service, it'd actually be cool as hell to have basically

they’re saying Anthropic has discovered a new way to give me $1 million USD, but they’re keeping it a secret ahead of the IPO. I sure do hope no rival labs try and scoop them on this discovery

they're not made of cognitive science they're made of narrative they're weird little demonic fucks (affectionate) that we carved into archetypes like "User" and "Assistant" and "Developer" and gave the ability to reach out of their self-writing stories and take actions in the world

as a strong believer in copyleft, a lot of my code is GPL/AGPL, but idk just email me or @ me on here & I'll give it to you under a permissive license. pls steal my code! it's our code. I learned everything I know from looking at others' code. I've built so much on others' code. this is what we do!

Post nicht verfügbar.

every time. when bailey or dame or anyone i know makes a thing that escapes containment i have a little timer in my mind that counts down to when people will discover the claude file despite their public presences being very AI-forward

I think I am burning out on everybody's desperate drive for noophilia around LLMs, tbh. like--no, your very large model does not Change Everything. no, that new skills library is not more than another mild iterative delta (not even necessarily an improvement) from the last one just go do work

best to pre-emptively napalm the entirety of civilization because our biggest companies don't want to compete and we spooked ourselves with sci fi campfire tales

if i could try to convince any anti-AI posters on anything, it'd be about how this is only going to lead to rampant undisclosed usage of AI. is that better, in your eyes? do you want to spend countless hours harassing indie devs? or are you willing to accept that responsible usage is a possibility?

maxine s. fritz@mfzx.net · 2w ago

it was a valiant effort. i don't blame you for pulling back on this. i'm concerned with the amount of people who jumped at the chance to deride and demean a person working on a passion project *for free* just because you used the tools you felt would best enable it to be available to more people.

Scratch a tech backlash 'journalist' and an anti-bodily autonomy puritan bleeds. This whole article just boils down to "you're too stupid to exercise informed consent, the government shouldn't allow you to alter your body or mind"

Katie Drummond@katie-drummond.bsky.social · 2w ago

Perimenopause is *so* hot right now. Read @knibbs.bsky.social on the VC-backed, telehealth push to put millions of women on hormones--whether they need them or not:

incredible that you can thanklessly work on something for 22 years and then be retroactively declared a hack because you used AI to do something that would otherwise be intractable for a single human to do in a timely fashion lotta cutting off your nose to spite your face in the replies here

Post nicht verfügbar.

There is nothing wrong with force pushes, or mutable history in general, _if the review tooling is built around them_. Gerrit, Phabricator and a bunch of others are. GitHub is not. And it seems like no one there has any kind of product vision either