New Left EViews

@newlefteviews.bsky.social

Economist, researcher, writer etc • Int'l & European political economy, geoeconomics, climate, history • 1/3 of 'Eurotrash' and host of 'States and Markets', writing a book on trade

The FT should be ashamed of this disgracefully ignorant piece that rehashes long discredited notions about public debt, fear-mongering about ‘a truly devastating debt explosion’ and wishing for a bond market ‘jolt’ to ‘concentrate minds’. I won’t even link to it.

Bild

When comparing advanced economies, there is a hard limit to how meaningful current output levels are. But let’s be accurate, especially when commentators make huge inferences from poor data. Here: the best measure of real output we have for this context, along with key wellbeing indicators.

BildBild
Washington Post Opinions@postopinions.bsky.social · 4w ago

“Living in France is the upscale American daydream,” @mcmegan.bsky.social says. “What’s a little harder to imagine is looking around me and thinking, ‘Yeah this place is definitely poorer than Mississippi.’ But when you look at GDP statistics, that’s actually what they seem to say.”

Productive investment is what drives long-run real growth. Any country that wants to maintain living standards and sustainably service its debt needs to maintain adequate levels of capital formation: investment in the things with which the economy creates more things: equipment, buildings, IP etc.

New Left EViews@newlefteviews.bsky.social · 4w ago

Arguably no advanced economy struggled more to invest and build than the United Kingdom. And the picture doesn't materially change for real GFCF, whether as a share of output, per capita or per hour. Have a piece on this later this month.

Arguably no advanced economy struggled more to invest and build than the United Kingdom. And the picture doesn't materially change for real GFCF, whether as a share of output, per capita or per hour. Have a piece on this later this month.

Bild

I don’t deny that a level of decoupling between growth and environmental impact has taken place (as argued in chart below). But the reason I take degrowth seriously is because I’m not sure decoupling is sufficiently fast/widespread/persistent to avoid (even more!) terrible warming scenarios.

Financial Times chart

Title: Growth used to come with increased environmental impact; now rich countries are growing while reducing their footprints

Subtitle: Trajectory of per-capita environmental impact and GDP, high-income countries, 1960-2022

Text beneath chart: Emissions are adjusted for trade and thus do not reflect offshoring of manufacturing. Source: 'Developed economies are growing while reducing many of their environmental impacts' (Dancer et al, 2026)
FT graphic: John Burn-Murdoch / @jburnmurdoch

Chart shows 4 faceted connected scatter plots, each with their own relative y axis.

On x axis is GDP per capita 

On y axis you have - 
1. CO2 emissions (t)
2. Material footprint (t)
3. Primary energy (MWh)
4. SO2 emissions (kg)

ALL PER CAPITA

The trends show all y axis variables peaked and declined (but all at different rates) as GDP per capita increases over time. This is meant to argue and illustrate the decoupling case.

"If austerity killed the recovery from the crisis, Brexit killed the recovery from austerity." – @newlefteviews.bsky.social www.newstatesman.com/business/eco...

You can't blame Brexit anymore

Our economy was broken long before the referendum

newstatesman.com

New Left EViews@newlefteviews.bsky.social · 4w ago

I’m in the @newstatesman1913.bsky.social today, trying to account for Brexit’s role in Britain’s long decline. The verdict: it killed the recovery from austerity, which had killed the recovery from the crisis. Rejoining single market maybe worth the political capital one day—but not now. Link👇

Imagine if hundreds of people died in hurricane or floods smashing through Europe Heatwaves have already killed that many ppl. They are a silent killer in that they dont generate outrage or fear. Hope this by @economist.com helps save lives as Europeans wake up to danger bsky.app/profile/eate...

Bild
Oliver Morton, Eater of Sun@eaterofsun.bsky.social · last mo.

My round up of @economist.com's heatwave coverage (gift link) www.economist.com/europe/2026/...

The Mississippi versus UK thing is funny and I think it's worth discussing in a longer essay that I'm writing on Britain's decline, so I've removed the thread from yesterday for now. But for now here are the headline graphics.

BildBild

Europe vs America: Supplemental Once more with feeling: here’s a small test that strengthens the case that the productivity wedge since 1995 in the constant PPP series is a deflator asymmetry mirage and that the chained PPP series adjusts for along with Balassa-Samuelson: 1/

Bild

Europe vs America: Supplemental Once more with feeling: here’s a small test that strengthens the case that the productivity wedge since 1995 in the constant PPP series is a deflator asymmetry mirage and that the chained PPP series adjusts for along with Balassa-Samuelson: 1/

Bild

Reposting this from the other site: So this new paper (by very smart, well-meaning scholars) builds an elegant structural transformation model whose central virtue is that it reproduces the apparent timing of US-Europe productivity divergence, that is 1995 (as highlighted in the Draghi report) 1/

Journal of International Economics@jintlecon.bsky.social · 3mo ago

New at JIE: "Europe falling behind: Structural transformation and labor productivity growth differences between Europe and the U.S" by Cesare Buiatti, Joao B. Duarte, Luis Felipe Sáenz doi.org/10.1016/j.ji...