I have been avoiding weighing in on this, because I don't support the law's unapologetic policy of assimilation. I think this article's statements about article 63, however, are not correct that the law allows pursuit of people absent a charge, or court, anywhere in the world. [SHORT ๐งต]
Turquoise Roof @turquoiseroof.org ยท 2d agoChinaโs new Ethnic Unity Law doesnโt just target dissent at home, it claims the right to pursue critics abroad. A concise explanation of why Article 63 matters for #Tibetan, #Uyghur, & other diaspora communities in Canada theconversation.com/china-is-cla...
