Josefin Sundin

@josefin-sundin.bsky.social

Animal ecology, aquatic biology, fish, European eel, fisheries, conservation, anthropogenic stressors, reproducibility and scientific integrity. Associate Professor @SLU Aqua, Stockholm

Today I am sharing a new preprint and accompanying blog post. Hundreds of published papers include impossible western blots showing protein expression in cell lines that have deleted or mutated genes. These clumsy mistakes are widespread and repeated by LLMs.

Bild

I've had several people contact me being surprised, asking if this misconduct case is still ongoing. It is! Unfortunately these things take time, and I still expect a few more retractions (in addition to the 3 retractions + multiple expressions of concerns and corrections already out).

Fredrik Jutfelt 🐠@jutfelt.bsky.social · last mo.

A foundational paper on the effects of ocean acidification on fish behaviour is retracted! "neither the publisher nor the editor has confidence in the article, primarily because the data provided during the investigation were not consistent with the observation methods described in the article."

This is the third retraction and it comes five years after we flagged data inconsistencies and other issues in 22 papers from this team. Several papers are still under investigation. Science ran a big story about this case: www.science.org/content/arti...

Does ocean acidification alter fish behavior? Fraud allegations create a sea of doubt

Whistleblowers cite eyewitness reports, data anomalies, and outsize effects in studies, but researchers deny wrongdoing

science.org

A foundational paper on the effects of ocean acidification on fish behaviour is retracted! "neither the publisher nor the editor has confidence in the article, primarily because the data provided during the investigation were not consistent with the observation methods described in the article."

Bild

It’s well known that finding reviewers is increasingly difficult. Yet I often meet researchers—especially ECRs—who’ve never or rarely been asked to review but would like to. Is that you? Natural History Notes are the perfect place to start. Aquatic & terrestrial ecologists welcome—get in touch!

Screen shot of Austral Ecology Journal with the journal title at the top. And below header text saying Editorial - An Austral Ecology 5 year retrospective on Natural History Notes: A compelling case for curiosity. Author - Stephanie K. Courtney Jones

"Proceeding of the Royal society" is now officially on my list of absolutely shit journals... They published the worst paper I have every peer reviewed (and the worst piece of scientific writing I have ever read, by far).

Elsevier says it will begin investigating two papers coauthored by disgraced surgeon Paolo Macchiarini “soon,” more than a year after critics of his work formally requested the publisher retract the articles—and nearly a decade after two institutions found him guilty of misconduct for related work.

Elsevier to ‘soon investigate’ two Macchiarini papers more than a year after retraction request

Paolo Macchiarini Elsevier says it will begin investigating two papers coauthored by disgraced surgeon Paolo Macchiarini “soon,” more than a year after two critics of his work formally requested th…

retractionwatch.com

🚨 Behavioral ecologists 🚨 I am about ready to submit a review paper on animal contest behavior. If you have any high quality photos of your study system engaging in a dyadic interaction (fight), DM me. I am revising a figure that has photos of different study systems. Photo creds will be provided!