Stephen Bush

@stephenkb.bsky.social

Associate editor and columnist @financialtimes.com. Post too often about culture, public policy, management, politics, nerd stuff, Arsenal the champions, wosoc. Wow! (center) Try my UK politics newsletter for free here: www.ft.com/tryinsidepolitics

Suddenly imagined a Princess-Bride-esque modern frame to the period piece with teen incredulous at how no-one intervened. (That said, my teen finds a lot of US school movies bizarre, for the exact same reason.)

This is 100 per cent correct in my view. Carrie is, as someone on here put it, ultimately a tragedy based on 'what if, on the absolute worst moment of the worst day of your awful life, someone handed you a fully loaded gun?' and for various reasons the crescendo leading up to that doesn't work now.

Martin Concagh@mconcagh.bsky.social · 19h ago

Actually my hot take about Carrie, and The Stand, is that they could/should only be adapted as period pieces.

hey man, we’re all here because we love you, and because we’re worried about the number of interventions you’re staging these days

The problem is - understandably! - people starting from “what’s a kids book I like?” not “what’s a successful 10 hour adaptation of any book?” eg The longest TV adaptation of Anna Karenina is still an hour and twenty minutes shy of 10 hours.

Stephen Bush@stephenkb.bsky.social · 22h ago

A handful of great shouts here, but most have the same “do you know how long an hour IS and do you understand that TV is a different medium to books” problem as the HP series.

Where an adaptation can get longer and better suited for TV not film - and this is where I am excited for The Husbands TV show and dreading the Tomorrow and Tomorrow film - is when what you need is precisely to convey time passing, rather than plot.

James Ball@jamesrball.com · 20h ago

TV *eats plot*. It just absolutely devours it. The sheer amount of story you need to fill even six hours is absurd. It doesn't feel like it as a viewer (if they've done it right) but once you've seen it through the other side of the process...oh boy.

TV *eats plot*. It just absolutely devours it. The sheer amount of story you need to fill even six hours is absurd. It doesn't feel like it as a viewer (if they've done it right) but once you've seen it through the other side of the process...oh boy.

Stephen Bush@stephenkb.bsky.social · 22h ago

A handful of great shouts here, but most have the same “do you know how long an hour IS and do you understand that TV is a different medium to books” problem as the HP series.

In theory having ten hours of a TV season instead of two hours of movie to play with should allow showrunners to go full Tarkovsky, but the only guy with the courage to do that right now is Vince Gilligan on Pluribus. Mostly other showrunners crowd those hours with meaningless incidents.

Stephen Bush@stephenkb.bsky.social · 22h ago

A handful of great shouts here, but most have the same “do you know how long an hour IS and do you understand that TV is a different medium to books” problem as the HP series.

Thomas the Tank Engine episodes are about 5 minutes each, and I’m just not sure what to say to people who think those can each be easily turned into 20 minute episodes (let alone hour-long episodes), other than just “No they can’t”

That first point hits the nail on the head, and I'd further refine it to "do you know how long an hour is *to a child*?" – even if you could adapt a children's book to a 10-hour series, 1hr episodes are simply too long for the target audience. Frankly, 30mins is pushing it. 20-25mins is ideal, imo.

This is a fair point but it fails to take account of the fact that four of the ten episodes will focus on the 1991 ITV franchise auction. HBO looked at the ratings smash of "Rivals" and saw a big opportunity to lean into this side of the story

Stephen Bush@stephenkb.bsky.social · yesterday

Either this show will be a massive failure, which will have big commercial consequences and therefore terrible creative ones elsewhere in HBO/Skydance, or it will be a success, which will result in new frontiers of padding across every other established property.

Season 1, which has wrapped production in May, will have the much-needed room to breathe. Flynn shared Harry Potter will have ten hours of footage, which means it will expand its runtime beyond one-hour,
"I think it's great, there's a lot more scope in the series to play with nuance, because obviously the films are sort of two hours versus ten hours of TV, so there's the opportunity to pull out different shades.