Stephen Bush

@stephenkb.bsky.social

Associate editor and columnist @financialtimes.com. Post too often about culture, public policy, management, politics, nerd stuff, Arsenal the champions, wosoc. Wow! (center) Try my UK politics newsletter for free here: www.ft.com/tryinsidepolitics

This is the point I feel strongest about. We've (society) managed to pick the stupidest way of dealing with this stuff, in which excellent blackface jokes in both The Office and 30 Rock are now memory-holed because American TV execs are unable to distinguish between "joke" and "endorsement".

Three years ago we ran an interesting experiment on public attitudes to censoring content such as Fawlty Towers and Agatha Christie's most popular work. We found that, while context and detail was important, in all the cases we tested a plurality wanted a warning but not a change to be made.

Stephen Bush@stephenkb.bsky.social · 1h ago

Set out my feelings about why I just don’t like this trend towards creating a better past by censoring your own archive:

As an academic and journalist, I think falsifying archival records in this way is also professional malpractice. A future historian viewing a film from the archive in 2050 should know if the object they are viewing was made in 1996 or 2026. You cannot falsely catalog the latter as the former.

Stephen Bush@stephenkb.bsky.social · 1h ago

Set out my feelings about why I just don’t like this trend towards creating a better past by censoring your own archive:

I've always thought the approach they took to (of all things) the Loony Tunes cartoons made sense. To paraphrase: "Some of this contains attitudes and images that aren't okay and don't reflect who we are now but we're leaving them in rather than pretending they never happened."

"Can we at least get that probability below 10%? One chance in ten seems like a lot. Could we get it into single figures? Five per cent, I can work with. That’s a 95 per cent chance of it not happening." Comms advice for the AI bosses competiting to wipe out humanity www.ft.com/content/780c...

Investors need to know you are ahead in the race to destroy humanity

A behind-the-scenes look at the work of Rutherford Hall, critical communications strategist

ft.com

The Jabba scene is a perfect example. It reiterates, even with duplicate dialogue, and adds nothing other than "here is a character previously mentioned." The scene was rightly cut, not merely b/c they didn't have the tech in '77, but b/c it's redundant and kills the pace.

Don’t really think there’s a public interest in the story to give it this much publicity on the BBC. He’s literally just publicising his book!