Tessera
Folgen

Cristian Mesquida

@crist14n.bsky.social

Postdoctoral researcher at Eindhoven University of Technology. Having a great time doing meta-research.

23 Posts196 Follower206 Folgt
Daniel Lakens@lakens.bsky.social · 3d ago

In the last 2 years I (and our lovely collaborators) have been rather obsessively working on Metacheck - a tool to automatically check best practices in papers. In this RIOTS summerschool talk, I walk you through what the tool can do, and future plans www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWd2...

Metacheck: automatically check papers for best practices - Daniel Lakens

Can automated tools help researchers catch problems before their work is published? In this talk from the King’s Open Research Summer School 2026, Professor Daniël Lakens (Eindhoven University of…

youtube.com

Emil Hvitfeldt@emilhvitfeldt.bsky.social · 2w ago

I got double Data Science Lab news! firstly is that the recording for my last appearance is now on youtube! I'm also happy to announce that I will be joining the Data Science Lab again next week, we will be going over Quarto slide themes, pos.it/dslab youtu.be/vQbhFORULJc #quarto

Mind-Blowing Quarto Slide Extensions 💬 🖍️ 🤯 | Emil Hvitfeldt | Data Science Lab

The Data Science Lab is a live weekly call. Register at pos.it/dslab! Discord invites go out each week on lives calls. We'd love to have you! The Lab is an open, messy space for learning and asking…

youtu.be

Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez@frodsan.bsky.social · 2w ago

Nice! Self-contained reproducible #Rstats scripts or #Quarto documents Specify versions (or date) for R and R packages directly in the script or document

ir makes the runtime specification part of the source file. That means a script can say, directly: which packages it needs which R should run it, when that needs to be explicit whether user libraries should be visible whether CRAN packages should be resolved as of a specific date This should help you rerun the script reliably at a later date. Keeping the metadata in the file makes it less likely to be lost or fall out of sync with the code.Quarto documents too# ir uses the same metadata model for Quarto documents. Put package metadata under an ir: key in the document YAML: --- title: My report ir: packages: - dplyr>=1.0 - gt@1.0 isolated: true exclude-newer: 2025-05-15 --- Then render with: $ ir render report.qmd $ ir render report.qmd --to pdf When ir selects an R executable using --r-version, frontmatter ir.r-version, or date-only exclude-newer, it sets QUARTO_R so Quarto renders with that R. ir also seeds rmarkdown automatically for knitr-based renders unless you declare it yourself.
Tomasz Kalinowski@t-kalinowski.bsky.social · 2w ago

I'm happy to share `ir`, a new command-line tool for running portable R scripts and Quarto documents. It's inspired by my two favorite parts of `uv`: self-describing scripts and tools you can run without installing first. opensource.posit.co/blog/2026-07...

Felienne Hermans@felienne.bsky.social · last mo.

Podcast alert!!!! Together with Hanna Schraffenberger I am launching the Computer Science Off Course Podcast Today! Computer Science curricula are very very narrow in scope with a lot of math and algorithms, but very little meta science, philosophy or history.

A laptop screen showing our new podcast Computer Science Off Course on rss.com
Michèle Nuijten@michelenuijten.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Should automated tools for peer review come with a "nutritional label" for validity?🥪 And if so, what should be on it? Join my workshop on June 5th @ the META/e Conference on Transparency, Technology and AI in Peer Review in Eindhoven! Results will inform our FAIR validation framework. Details >>

A table with the same layout as a nutritional label, but instead filled out with Validation Facts. Categories include tool information, ground truth, performance, and limitations & generalizability.
Cristian Mesquida@crist14n.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Are you interested in how technology and AI are reshaping peer review and grant evaluation? You can still register for the conference Transparency, Technology & AI in Peer Review at TU/e on June 5.

Bild
James Bartlett@bartlettje.bsky.social · 3mo ago

🚨 New article klaxon 🚨 Gaby Mahrholz, @emilynordmann.bsky.social and I have our article "Practice What You Preach: Designing Student Assignments That Advance Open and Reproducible Science" published in AMPPS. doi.org/10.1177/2515...

Practice What You Preach: Designing Student Assignments That Advance Open and Reproducible Science - James Bartlett, Gaby Mahrholz, Emily Nordmann, 2026

Since the replication crisis came to widespread attention in psychology, there has been significant progress in reforming research practices to be more open and...

doi.org

Ed Ivimey-Cook@eivimeycook.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Introducing * READMEBuilder * A shiny app that helps users build a high quality README to upload along with their data and code. Just install the package and run the build_readme() function to launch the app! github.com/EIvimeyCook/... Comments and suggestions welcome!

GitHub - EIvimeyCook/READMEBuilder: Shiny application that walks researchers through building a high-quality README file for research datasets and code. Automatically describes tabular data co...

Shiny application that walks researchers through building a high-quality README file for research datasets and code. Automatically describes tabular data columns (ranges, levels, NAs), det...

github.com

Peter Tennant@pwgtennant.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Today is another day where weak science published in 'top' journals makes the headlines. Take this 'tool' to identify people at risk of obesity-related disease, published in @natmed.nature.com. I would be shocked and concerned if this tool is ever used! www.theguardian.com/society/2026...

UK researchers develop tool to identify people most at risk of obesity-related diseases

Data tool could help NHS prioritise who gets access to limited weight-loss medication, say scientists

theguardian.com

Chris Chavez@chrischavez.bsky.social · 3mo ago

OMG. 🇰🇪 Sabastian Sawe becomes the first man ever to break 2 hours in a marathon (legal conditions) in 1:59:30 at the London Marathon! Yomif Kejelcha 🇪🇹 runs 1:59:41 in his DEBUT. Jacob Kiplimo 🇺🇬 takes third in 2:00:28 All under the previous WR.

Cristian Mesquida@crist14n.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Are you interested in how technology and AI are reshaping peer review and grant evaluation? We are organising a conference at TU/e on June 5, 2026 on Transparency, Technology & AI in Peer Review to explore the opportunities, challenges, and risks for research quality and integrity.

Bild
Daniel Lakens@lakens.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Hope to see you at the Conference on Transparency, Technology and AI in Peer Review on June 5, 2026, which is organized in collaboration with the Center for Humans and Technology at Eindhoven University of Technology. Register at: meta-eindhoven.github.io/events/

META/e

Events ## META/e Conference on Transparency, Technology and AI in Peer Review **Eindhoven University of Technology, 5 June 2026** Maximum attendees: 100 **Organizers**: [Vlasta Sikimić](https://vlastasikimic.com/),...

meta-eindhoven.github.io

Jamie Cummins@jamiecummins.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Super happy to be giving a keynote talk at this timely and topical conference. I will talk about our recent efforts to build and evaluate workflows to help compare study registrations and papers in psychology, medicine, economics, and preclinical trials. Come join us in Eindhoven!

Daniel Lakens@lakens.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Hope to see you at the Conference on Transparency, Technology and AI in Peer Review on June 5, 2026, which is organized in collaboration with the Center for Humans and Technology at Eindhoven University of Technology. Register at: meta-eindhoven.github.io/events/

Lisa DeBruine@debruine.bsky.social · 4mo ago

I’m attending this, and will be arguing strongly for the values we use for generative AI use in metacheck: 1. AI should be optional and opt-in 2. AI should only be used to assist in categorising/identifying, never evaluating 3. All tools should provide transparent validation data

Cristian Mesquida@crist14n.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Are you interested in how technology and AI are reshaping peer review and grant evaluation? We are organising a conference at TU/e on June 5, 2026 on Transparency, Technology & AI in Peer Review to explore the opportunities, challenges, and risks for research quality and integrity.

Cristian Mesquida@crist14n.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Are you interested in how technology and AI are reshaping peer review and grant evaluation? We are organising a conference at TU/e on June 5, 2026 on Transparency, Technology & AI in Peer Review to explore the opportunities, challenges, and risks for research quality and integrity.

Bild