Boston Bugsy

@bostonbugsy.bsky.social

He/him pronouns. Product of the 80s. I like noir, horror, soul music, rock and roll, a bunch of other stuff.

Often when someone makes a dumbass post like this and everyone's dunking on it, some folk pop up to say, "Actually I think this is a joke" and it's like, yeah, no shit, Sherlock. This entire website is a joke. The point is the joke is bad and they should feel bad.

Bryan Johnson post:

I have an AI agent that logs every negative comment someone makes about me online.

It then creates a profile of the person, maps all of their social connections, and finds all their emails.

Tomorrow morning, my AI agent will send out an email blast to everyone's extended social network, detailing the horrible things they've said about me.

I'm really fucking devastated right now so instead here's the picture Patrick Stewart posted nearly 13 years ago to the day with the caption "happy halloween" of him dressed as a giant lobster in a bathtub.

Patrick Stewart dressed as a lobster in a bathtub

The NY Times will publish a hit piece on the Democratic Alaska senate candidate six days before an Election but won't mention a new rape allegation against the President of the United States.

He is the President and he has been breaking the law with impunity, over and over and then flaunting it in public. The Supreme Court has said the only way to punish him is impeachment. Not impeaching sends the message that any president anytime in the future can do whatever the fuck they want.

Starfire’s Deranged Neocon Foreign Policy Podcast@irhottakes.bsky.social · 4d ago

They already did that twice and removal or revolution still didn't occur. By all means, say it's the principle of the thing and hell, I'll even agree with you, but that's all it is. Some GOP senators genuinely agree with him and some just think he'll kill them if they impeach but same result.

I emailed Patrick Healy, assistant managing editor for standards and trust at NYT, to ask why their story about a House report with new details of rape allegations against the President of the United States included neither those details, nor a single use of the word "rape." archive.is/1s9AM

Hi Patrick-

I'm reaching out regarding a story NYT published yesterday by Michael Gold titled "Democrats Call for Special Counsel to Scrutinize Trump ties to Epstein." It's about a report  published yesterday by the House Judiciary Democrats further detailing President Trump's ties to Jeffrey Epstein and new details about allegations of rape against Trump. 

One such allegation is from a Swiss model named Beatrice Keul, who the report says alleges in 1993 Trump "grabbed Keul from behind and forcibly raped her; in the process, tearing her dress and causing bleeding and bruising on multiple parts of her body.” These details are new, yet they didn't appear anywhere in Gold's story. In fact, the word "rape" does not appear in the story even once, despite multiple allegations. The story seems much more focused on the timing of the reports—a week before Election Day—and much less concerned with the gruesome details.


As someone who read all 53 pages of the report, I would like to understand NYT's avoidance of the word "rape" in a story about a report concerning rape allegations. If you could explain the rationale, I think it would be quite useful for me and for others.


Thank you,
Marisa

Celebrating Una O'Connor born Oct 23, in 1880. Over 80 roles, maids, crones, chaperones including The Adventures of Robin Hood, Witness for the Prosecution, The Invisible Man, David Copperfield, Of Human Bondage, The Bells of St Mary's, and The Bride of Frankenstein #botd

Bild