Tiago Peixoto

@tiago.skewed.de

Statistical mechanic, secular Bayesian. Prof. of Complex Systems and Network Science @ Goethe University Frankfurt Head of the “Inverse Complexity Lab”. @invcomplexity.skewed.de https://skewed.de/lab (Personal account)

I think people really should understand — especially young researchers — that if you use LLMs to draft most of the text of your paper, then: 1. It is often entirely obvious that you did just that. 2. The quality of the generated text is often terrible, and it hurts to read it.

Approximating the Lorenz attractor with a chaotic leaky water wheel. The orange dot is the centre of mass of the water. It traces (a projection of) the familiar attractor as the wheel spins seemingly randomly left and right.

At ~$0.07/kWh for electricity alone, $22M buys ~310 million kWh. A human spending 100W on average consumes ~64,000 kWh in 75 years. So $22M corresponds to the lifetime metabolic energy of roughly 4,800 people. This is brute force, not intelligence.

Tiago Peixoto@tiago.skewed.de · 3w ago

Some humans were already fooled by Eliza-like programs decades ago. I don't think we stand much of a chance against data-driven brute force at scale mascarading as intelligence. Most people can't intuitively grasp what $22M of computing power means. The AGI propaganda will be difficult to beat.

Some humans were already fooled by Eliza-like programs decades ago. I don't think we stand much of a chance against data-driven brute force at scale mascarading as intelligence. Most people can't intuitively grasp what $22M of computing power means. The AGI propaganda will be difficult to beat.

Trevor A. Branch@trevorabranch.bsky.social · 3w ago

Millennium math problem solved by OpenAI may have "regurgitated" competitors unpublished work... also they spent more than $22 million in computing power in one week to scoop them. techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/o...

And you have to ask yourself: why was it worth $22M to them? Because to them math is just their most successful PR bid, (since the claims of AGI aren't sticking). They are betting that the (false) claim "We solved math, so we can solve everything" will gain them way more than $22M in market share.

Trevor A. Branch@trevorabranch.bsky.social · 3w ago

Millennium math problem solved by OpenAI may have "regurgitated" competitors unpublished work... also they spent more than $22 million in computing power in one week to scoop them. techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/o...

“Almost everyone who ever lived was born recently, because population grew exponentially, so a random birth is far more likely to fall near the present.” According to this logic, either we are all outliers or our individual presence is this date is evidence for the end of the world coming soon.

Julia M. Rohrer@dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 4w ago

Fun little game in which a human life is randomly drawn for you. I ended up a girl, born in the Yangtze Basin in 670 CE. Died in infancy at 6 months 🥲 anyhumanever.com

This is remarkable. Marco Rubio stated, "Iranians are thieves. They cannot impose tolls on the Strait of Hormuz." In response, Abbas Araghchi remarked, "Consider the speaker. Approximately half of Venezuela's oil production is now directed to the United States. Who is truly the thief?"

Bild

People of Clacton! Show your support for me by putting a bin outside your house, one day this week, of a colour of Tendring Council's choice. This will be unequivocal proof of the success of my campaign.

People rave about AI doing everything from proving theorems to finding bugs in software, etc, but by far the biggest boon to my productivity has been the ability to add my signature to PDFs directly from Firefox and Thunderbird with a few mouse clicks. What a time to be alive.

It's hard to express how weird and cool it was to think about virtual reality and the internet *before* it existed, while the USSR was still standing (even in the future predicted in the book). Reality turned out to be so much lamer; even if our computers have way more than 3 MB of *HOT RAM*.

Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛@rmcelreath.bsky.social · 2mo ago

ok I looked up the different editions and I am pretty sure this is the cover of the used paperback I had. so like 1985. you young people have no idea how cool this book was

My investor told me he doesn't really see the moat in my plan. I explained that's the point. The glacis protects the base of the wall and obscures the ditch entirely. By the time the assault party reaches the counterscarp with fascines, they will be committed and under crossfire from grapeshot