Jon Parry

@jonparryhis.bsky.social

Retired university History teacher. Modern British politics. Short history of British Liberalism published by Agenda April 2025. Occasional LRB reviewer. Part-time resident and unofficial chronicler of Sark.

There is something that I think multiple successive prime ministers over the last decade or so have failed to grasp and to respond to: that the way backbench MPs see their role has shifted.

Without a clearer sense of direction, Labour's doomed. So, by far the best thing that these two could do now would be to stop worrying about how best to become PM if and when Starmer eventually goes and instead think really, really hard about what they would do were they chosen to replace him.

Photo of Streeting and Rayner

Also in this issue: Colin Burrow on satire Jon Day on rat sociology Becca Rothfeld on Tony Tulathimutte’s anti-autofiction Ange Mlinko reviews Michelle de Kretser's 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘗𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦 Stephen Buryani on proteins gone rogue @jonparryhis.bsky.social on Britain in Sudan David Trotter on golf ...

This is also important for its electoral system effects - being either the incumbent or the best place local opponents makes it easier to win tactical supports. Reform being in second place wherever they don't win poses an existential threat to the Conservatives down the line

Luke Tryl@luketryl.bsky.social · last yr.

We know Reform are winning lots of seats, but look at this under the bonnet - they dominate 2nd places too - in wards Labour, Tories, Lib Dems & Greens won Reform was most likely to have come 2nd in all of them. Thinking today *must* be a high water mark for Reform is a mistake as more ground to go

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but I wonder whether anyone in the Conservative leadership had the foresight to see in 2015 that the Osborne boast of ‘decapitating’ the Lib Dems rather than fighting in constructive alliance with them would in fact end up decapitating the Conservative Party

‘As great powers Russia and Britain had very few clashing interests. Though both wanted to expand, they could do so for many thousands of miles across Asia without interfering with each other.’ @jonparryhis.bsky.social on Russia and England in the 19th century: www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Jonathan Parry · Dancing the Mazurka: Anglo-Russian Relations

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain and Russia did not seek to divide the world between them and very rarely pointed...

lrb.co.uk

I’ve written something for Lib Dems about getting the balance right between ethical ideals & political campaigning. I argue there is a coherent Liberalism which is also politically savvy. And that a lot of Liberal history sets out how to do it. And, as it happens, I’ve just written the book on it!

Political Liberalism

How do we apply Liberalism in day-to-day politics?  A thoughtful new book, When We Speak of Freedom, edited by Paul Hindley and Benjamin Wood, deserves more discussion here. The subtitle is ‘Radical L...

libdemvoice.org

‘In 1836, John Stuart Mill claimed that the government had become “smitten with Russophobia”, an irrational panic that had triggered an unnecessary increase in defence spending. “Russophobia” has never quite left British public debate since.’ @jonparryhis.bsky.social: www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Jonathan Parry · Dancing the Mazurka: Anglo-Russian Relations

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain and Russia did not seek to divide the world between them and very rarely pointed...

lrb.co.uk

‘The press peddled excited theories about Russia’s ambitions for world domination, which Disraeli happily indulged in order to show that in his genius he could stop its armies reaching even the Mediterranean.’ @jonparryhis.bsky.social on the origins of ‘Russophobia’: www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Jonathan Parry · Dancing the Mazurka: Anglo-Russian Relations

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain and Russia did not seek to divide the world between them and very rarely pointed...

lrb.co.uk

‘The history of Anglo-Russian relations is interesting not just in itself but because, when tensions have arisen, they have usually been prompted less by British or Russian behaviour than by extraneous factors.’ @jonparryhis.bsky.social on England’s ‘Russophobia’: www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Jonathan Parry · Dancing the Mazurka: Anglo-Russian Relations

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain and Russia did not seek to divide the world between them and very rarely pointed...

lrb.co.uk

‘For the last two hundred years, Western fears about Russia have ultimately stemmed from politics more than geopolitics: from liberal distrust of the unpredictability and violence of absolutism.’ @jonparryhis.bsky.social on Russia and England in the 19th century: www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Jonathan Parry · Dancing the Mazurka: Anglo-Russian Relations

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain and Russia did not seek to divide the world between them and very rarely pointed...

lrb.co.uk

‘As great powers Russia and Britain had very few clashing interests. Though both wanted to expand, they could do so for many thousands of miles across Asia without interfering with each other.’ @jonparryhis.bsky.social on Russia and England in the 19th century: www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Jonathan Parry · Dancing the Mazurka: Anglo-Russian Relations

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain and Russia did not seek to divide the world between them and very rarely pointed...

lrb.co.uk

‘In 1836, John Stuart Mill claimed that the government had become “smitten with Russophobia”, an irrational panic that had triggered an unnecessary increase in defence spending. “Russophobia” has never quite left British public debate since.’ @jonparryhis.bsky.social: www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Jonathan Parry · Dancing the Mazurka: Anglo-Russian Relations

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain and Russia did not seek to divide the world between them and very rarely pointed...

lrb.co.uk