Rob Ford

@robfordmancs.bsky.social

Politics Professor, University of Manchester. Sky News Elections Analyst Author of "The British General Election of 2024" & "Brexitland". All takes are mine only. "The Swingometer", is here: https://swingometer.substack.com/ https://www.robertford.net/

Notice DOJ doesn't talk about its efforts to obtain state voter files anymore. They are 0-20 in those cases and today is the beginning of the quiet period -- states can no longer do systematic removals of names from the voter rolls. TLDR: We won!🥳

Universities cannot make money teaching home undergrads or doing funded research. Indeed, those run at a large loss. Only teaching international students make sense in any way. The logical endpoint is taking only international students, reducing research and moving many ops out of the UK altogether.

Bild

a great section on evidence.. Here's the strongest case for the politics being to blame "Interviews consistently emphasised that spending decisions are not made in a neutral, technocratic environment but...shaped by political priorities, negotiation and the need to respond to immediate pressures."

"At key moments after 2010, ‘spend-to-save’ initiatives were described to us by a senior official as ‘completely non-negotiable’. The Treasury bias against ‘spend-to-save’ is so pervasive that we heard numerous examples of where departments and agencies self-select against well-evidenced proposals"

"The Treasury’s core function of maintaining control over the public finances has historically been interpreted through the lens of short-term fiscal discipline. This is expressed most clearly in the emphasis placed on meeting spending control totals within defined timeframes"

"This prioritisation matters. It means that control is often concentrated where it is most achievable, rather than where it is most needed. This is often not the most efficient use of public money."

"heavy-handed Treasury control is applied unevenly and tends to focus on areas that are politically salient, relatively contained, or easier to measure. The Treasury prefers to allocate money in specialised pots for this reason."

Rob hints at this but it’s worth reiterating that a major failure of the Starmer government was their inability to convey a consistent antiracist message or uphold norms. They confused anger about ‘the boats’ with generalised racism and since they couldn’t denounce the former they avoided the latter

Rob Ford@robfordmancs.bsky.social · yesterday

This is what happens when anti-racism norms erode, and elites bear a lot of the responsibility for norm erosion, as they have disproportionate power to set and enforce norms

I don't have a lot to add to the Jason Arday discourse but would make one observation - I think in situations like this it is always wide to ask "how would I react to this pattern of behaviour if exhibited by a political opponent/someone whose values/ideology I reject?"

This is what happens when anti-racism norms erode, and elites bear a lot of the responsibility for norm erosion, as they have disproportionate power to set and enforce norms

Charles EP Murphy@cepmurphy.bsky.social · yesterday

news.sky.com/story/nhs-st... stereotypically this has been seen as Old People, but not only would the old people of now have often been born post-Windrush, lot of this will be younger people who've always lived in a diverse Britain. The guy with a pregnant wife likely millennial at oldest

A useful reminder that the Conservatives' electoral problems are not solely about appeal and image, but also organisational.

Joe Egerton@joeegg.bsky.social · 2d ago

The great Conservative debacle in Greater Manchester has attracted comment by @timbale.bsky.social , @dylandifford.bsky.social , @robertsaunders.bsky.social @stephenkb.bsky.social and others. Electoral Commission data shows the Party's organisational disintegration open.substack.com/pub/jegerton...

Germany, Verian poll: AfD-ESN: 27% CDU/CSU-EPP: 21% (-1) GRÜNE-G/EFA: 15% SPD-S&D: 13% LINKE-LEFT: 12% (+1) FDP-RE: 4% BSW-NI: 3% +/- vs. 24-30 June 2026 Fieldwork: 22-28 July 2026 Sample size: 1456 ➤ europeelects.eu/germany

Bild

Glad someone senior from the sector is pushing back. Labour MPs need to understand the serious real anger from graduates and the people who produce them. And the dangerous financial situation they have allowed to fester, or indeed worsened, in one of Britain’s leading sectors.

Labour has harmed universities as much as Trump, London School of Economics head says

LSE vice-chancellor Larry Kramer points to domestic student fees freeze, international student limits and rise in employers’ national insurance

ft.com

Labour's share: Manchester 54% (+23 vs local elections) Stockport 50% (+37) Trafford 50% (+27) Wigan 47% (+22) Bury 47% (+21) Salford 47% (+19) Tameside 42% (+18) Oldham 42% (+21) Rochdale 41% (+16) Bolton 40% (+21)

Labour had been confident since near the beginning of the mayoral election here but *not* at the point Burnham stood in Makerfield. There were genuine fears Reform could take it. I did wonder whether an AB in number 10 would shift the dial automatically but my word did it.

Impressive win for Lab - well ahead of the polling. Nearly didn’t need second round. Disappointing for Reform and Greens. Restore performance remarkable for a party that’s just months old - might have harmed Reform? But Lab would have won comfortably even without them.

Election Maps UK@electionmaps.uk · 5d ago

Greater Manchester Mayoral By-Election Result: 🌹 Craig | LAB: 47.2% ➡️ Astley | RFM: 21.0% 🌍 Coggins | GRN: 12.2% ◼️ West | RES: 8.7% 🌳 Eckersley | CON: 7.7% 🔶 Kilpatrick | LDM: 2.2% 🙋 Farmer | Ind: 0.6% 2nd Round: 🌹 Craig | LAB: 66.3% ➡️ Astley | RFM: 33.7% Labour HOLD.