CutieKyubii🦊✨️💜

@kyubii.bsky.social

VTuber | Amature Artist | Romani | Fox/Fae/She🦊🏳️‍⚧️ | 🔞MINORS DNI | ❌️AI/NFT DNI❌️ | 🎨tags: #CutieKyubArt / #LewdieKyubii Links/Contact: https://cutiekyubii.carrd.co/ pfp 🎨: https://bsky.app/profile/pupnik.moe

I made it through stream I did it we did 30 turns of Mario Party Jamboree. I've never made it through stream after a flashback in the same day and idk whether to be proud of myself or mad for trying to push through lol

Hi outing myself rn but this has the ability to directly effect me and many many others like me and if you think this is okay in any way at all, never ever speak to me again. Block me, fuck off, fine the nearest short pier to take a long walk off of. I'm going to go throw up now.

Sapling 🌱@sacredsapling.bsky.social · yesterday

Woke up to this news and I’m beyond disgusted. It’s a US *constitutional right* now to create and own ‘CSAM,’ as long as it was made with AI?? AI gen images are built from real images, of real children. This directly re-exploits every single CSAM survivor. (More in 🧵) #abolition #trafficking

A federal judge has ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess child sexual abuse content created using Al if it does not depict a real person and remains in the home.
On Tuesday, Judge John Z. Lee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th District ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using artificial intelligence if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home. In his ruling, Judge Lee urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the issue of virtual abuse material of children in the age of Al, suggesting that technological advances complicate existing legal precedent.
The case Lee ruled on came about in 2024 when the Department of Justice brought charges against Steven Anderegg, alleging that he used Al to create thousands of explicit images of children. He was accused of breaking federal obscenity laws by producing, distributing and possessing obscene visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Anderegg sought to have the possession and production charges dismissed under the First Amendment. Last year, a judge in the Western District of Wisconsin agreed to dismiss the possession charge, prompting the federal prosecutors to appeal.
Lee, in his ruling upholding the lower court's decision, cited the precedent set by Supreme Court rulings from 1969 and 2002. One held that individuals have a right to possess obscenity in the privacy of their home. The other found that "virtual" child sexual abuse material, not depicting a real person is not child pornography.

If you ever utter the thought or words "Not all consent is valid", eat glass and wash it down with gasoline, then chase it with a lit match, you fucking vile no-good waste of life.

Luke Ridge (Commissions open✏️)@lri.bsky.social · 6d ago

The darkness continues. #Cara has been scraped a third time!. This complete disregard for ethics, copyright law and creativity has to stop!. The team behind Cara are now going for legal help. You can aid them at the link below with their legal journey. Time to fight. #NoAI 🚫 gofund.me/3be9eeb3c

Did you know? If your game is 2GB or under, you can get 100 custom printed USB drives for $1.97 a piece. It's even cheaper if it's less! a.aliexpress.com/_mKioGrN Printed with your game's cover and a blurb on the back, you can make physical games! (Vetted for quality, we have used them before)

10/50/100pcs/lot Free Customized Logo Credit Card 4GB Pen Drive 8GB 16GB 32GB USB Sticks Flash Drive 1GB 2G Thumb Drive for Gift

Smarter Shopping, Better Living! Aliexpress.com

a.aliexpress.com

Embrace the classics. Embrace new indie darlings made entirely yet to hit the spotlight because they can't afford to advertise. Try that game your friend has been obsessed with for 20 years that you've never played. Start on your backlog. You don't need GTA VI.

Generative AI has not been used in ANY point of the process of making the DK64 recomp. We have not generated a single line of code with AI, and we're not even referencing it to solve a difficult problem. All code has been human made, backed with years of working with DK64 and referencing RT64 devs.

🔋D Battery🔋@dbattery.bsky.social · 2d ago

Heya, full clarity if you have a moment. I've seen that AI communities have had a trend of referring to something with minimal human involvement as vibe coding while giving Claude AI code a pass. Can I get a full confirmation that anything AI-related is not used in any of this project's development?