Alex Green (文浩航)

@glexareen.bsky.social

Associate Professor (Law), CUHK (Hong Kong SAR, PRC); Academic Associate, 23ES Chambers (UK); (international law, statehood, philosophy, culture, climate change & sea-level rise). Book 1: https://tinyurl.com/bdfa86ve Book 2: https://tinyurl.com/yc4nmrnm

Oh boy, I just love it when expensive books are marginally less expensive! Here is one of mine, with a global economy-shifting 20% off, right up until 30 June 2027! Apparently it won some sort of prize so, you know, fill your boots.

The flier in question.

Been demoralising watching universities mindlessly embrace genAI "inevitability", mouth platitudes about AI ethics, principles & fairness even as it contaminates & degrades knowledge & infrastructure, undermines learning, erodes trust & creates massive burdens from all the above REFUSE. RESIST👇

Excerpt from Emily Tucker's Open Letter to Georgetown students

"I am not suggesting you should resist a chatbot education because I expect you to have a smooth path at Georgetown if you do. It's definitely risky. And I'm not saying you should resist in spite of the risk. I'm saying you should resist because of the risk. The risk is what helps you remember, at a moment when everyone in authority is (or worse, is pretending to be) suffering from the insane delusion that the future of humanity depends on a computer program that generates probabilistic text strings, that there is something that learning is for, that thinking is for, that work is for, and that you are for, the discovery of which belongs to you. If you start now taking risks that help you remember this, you may become the kind of person who cannot be pushed around by bullies and autocrats, or manipulated by propaganda, or satisfied by a life lived solely for the sake of self-protection and self-enrichment."
Charles Logan@charleswlogan.bsky.social · 5mo ago

Solidarity with Emily Tucker and her open letter to students. Tucker writes, "But the great thing is, you don’t have to go along with this, and I urge you not to. You can refuse to use the chatbot. You can tell your professors that you don’t want them to use it or to require you to use it."

For me, this effectively symbolises much of what is unimpressive about AI (yes, I know *this* is robotics, but still). Marginally improved speed with everything that matters entirely removed. A marathon without runners, pointless to its core.

CNN@cnn.com · 4mo ago

Lightning, a running robot developed by Chinese smartphone maker Honor, finished a 21-kilometer (13 mile) run in Beijing in a stunning 50 minutes and 26 seconds, beating the human world record by more than six minutes. https://cnn.it/4mLRxQ8

🎉 Publication day! My book 𝙎𝙪𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙇𝙖𝙬 is out in the Edward 𝘌𝘭𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘓𝘢𝘸 𝘚𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴. If you want to know more about the ICC, the interpretation of its statute, prosecutorial decisions & policies, and judicial review, this book might be your next reading 1/

Bild

Working as I do, mainly with words, norms, and obligations, it can all feel a bit unreal at times. When I feel like that, I am always reminded how proud I am of my brother's artisanal woodturning career. Check out his website and give his Instagram a follow: www.ejgwoodcraft.uk?utm_content=...

Edmund Green Woodcraft

Woodturning on the Isle of Wight. Local timber used for premium woodturned items. Original designs, bespoke work, repairs.

ejgwoodcraft.uk

AI marketing really is a triumph of fiction over reality. We all know, basically, that most widely available LLMs are more than a bit silly and way more than a bit dangerous, yet somehow there are countless people willing to throw their lot in with the mega-rich backing them, just on the off chance.