Dan Levenstein

@dlevenstein.bsky.social

Neuroscientist, in theory. Studying sleep and navigation in 🧠s and 💻s. Wu Tsai Investigator, Assistant Professor of Neuroscience at Yale. An emergent property of a few billion neurons, their interactions with each other and the world over ~1 century.

I think the difficulty of understanding feedback loops underlies many big debates in science: Origin of life: "genes first" vs "metabolism first" (neither, it's a feedback loop) Development: "nature vs nurture" (neither, it's a feedback loop) Neuroscience: "brain vs behaviour" (you guessed it!)

This is why I’ve gone from “never want to touch a spiking network again” to “excited to do the kinds of things I always wanted to do with spiking networks” in the span of 5 years.

Dan Goodman@neural-reckoning.org · 3w ago

I just gave a short tutorial on what is a spiking neural network and how to train one. From zero to a trained network in one hour. Slides and code you can run in Colab at this repo: github.com/neural-recko... 🤖🧠🧪

So asking "is the brain a computer" is not helpful. Symbolic computation is sometimes a useful way of thinking about a brain feature, and sometimes not. And that's it. We really can stop talking about it now. I'm going to regret this. I know it.

When we talk about the current demolishing of NSF, we think a lot about the loss of research and scientific progress (which are of course very important). But in its founding documents, NSF was also set up to be an equalizer.

Higher education in this country is largely for those who have the means. If
those who have the means coincided entirely with those persons who have the
talent we should not be squandering a part of our higher education on those
undeserving of it, nor neglecting great talent among those who fail to attend
college for economic reasons. There are talented individuals in every segment
of the population, but with few exceptions those without the means of buying
higher education go without it. Here is a tremendous waste of the greatest
resource of a nation—the intelligence of its citizens.
If ability, and not the circumstance of family fortune, is made to deter-
mine who shall receive higher education in science, then we shall be as-
sured of constantly improving quality at every level of scientific activity.

Quoted from "The Endless Frontier"

This was in part because of the experience of doing science itself (and even getting to contribute an observation to the Minor Planet Circular!), but also because of what one of the graduate students said during one of those classroom days: "you get paid to do a PhD".

(apart from the important point that if we let AI do all our thinking, we are doomed) generally speaking this is why I have come to view presentations and paper writing as *doing science*, just as much as lab work or running computer simulations or whatever. Communication and discussion are central

Cian O'Donnell@cianodonnell.bsky.social · last mo.

During my postdoc I was trying to move to a new area, my supervisor said: you have to go to a conference, it's the only way to learn what they are thinking and what the key questions are. He was completely right. Science is a collective and social human pursuit, not a bunch of pdfs online

The most important step in designing a ML model is coming up with the name. For example, if your model name includes the string "(ours)", it seems to get way better performance on benchmarks. Someone should study the mechanism behind this.

One of the things I'm low key excited about getting married next weekend is that I'll never have to deal with Zola dot com ever again. Also all the other things, but that will be an unexpected bonus.

Interesting article on something I think is very relevant to open science: several teams analyzed the same ephys dataset and got quite different answers. Not because the analyses were bad, but because this kind of work involves many analysis choices, and those choices can change the result.

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Differences stemmed from the way researchers defined concepts, to the algorithms they used to analyze the data, to the parameters they employed when implementing the algorithms, note @mattiachini.bsky.social and Gaelle Chapuis. #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/reproducibil...