Daniel Roberts

@drobertsimg.bsky.social

FKA IronMikeGallego. I once wrote a few things you might’ve read but then I had kids. Cancer-hater. Gold Star Family. Recovering A’s fan. Combat sports wunderkind. Anti-Stratfordian. Lawyer. https://deadspin.com/the-trouble-with-floyd-mayweather-1605217498

Feel like this is broadly correct. AI is hideously immoral and should be illegal. The Third Circuit’s recent decision could well put the big firms out of business, which would be a huge win for humanity. BUT those of you who have convinced yourselves that it’s useless are deluding yourselves.

Will Oremus@willoremus.com · last wk.

feels like there is a group of smart and well-intentioned people who long ago made up their minds that AI Is Bad, swore off using it, and now get all their info about AI from each other. not saying they're wrong that ai is bad! but i think they're gradually losing touch with what it is and does

California just passed a law forbidding lawyers from delegating to AI and requiring them to disclose any use of AI in their briefs. NY has a bill to prohibit AI from dispensing any sort of legal advice. A number of federal judges outright ban it on briefs in their courts. You will see more of this.

Elizabeth Warren@elizabeth-warren.bsky.social · 4w ago

The time to act on AI is yesterday. I'm calling for an immediate pause on the development of advanced AI while lawmakers and regulators put systems in place to keep people safe.

I've been doing more testing and thinking. I'm now convinced genAI detection is possible and Pangram does it pretty well. But there are a few caveats. First, Pangram likely depends on the limits of current LLMs because it seems to be using n-gram math. 1/

Corey Rayburn Yung@coreyryung.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I uploaded a few texts to test Pangram, Unlke other AI detectors, it kind of works. It recognized some of my uploaded texts as 100% human (which they were). It identified genAI texts (although not that they were 100% LLM generated - see below).