Romesh Vaitilingam

@econromesh.bsky.social

Economics writer on new findings, policy analysis & commentary from a wide range of researchers & institutions Editor-in-chief of the Economics Observatory; Clark Center for Global Markets, Chicago; VoxEU; NIESR

A programme in #Chile that expanded access to higher education for disadvantaged youngsters has been delivering on its objective; but it has also had unintended consequences for students' efforts, reducing their study hours, grades & other measures of endeavour in the final year of high school

Such a great piece by my colleage @econromesh.bsky.social - "There is one final irony. The referendum is often presented as evidence that expertise no longer matters. I draw the opposite conclusion. Expertise matters enormously. That is precisely why it became a target."

Centre for Economic Performance@cep-lse.bsky.social · 4w ago

Despite a near total academic consensus on the negative consequences of Brexit, voters were not swayed. In a new LSE Impact blog, @econromesh.bsky.social (Economics Observatory, CEP) argues economists must communicate findings as carefully as they produce them. blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...

Excellent piece by @econromesh.bsky.social, explaining with illuminating clarity that "In an age when authority itself is contested, economists need to devote as much care to how evidence is communicated – and why it should be trusted – as they do to producing it in the first place"

John Springford@johnspringford.bsky.social · 4w ago

Interesting piece by @econromesh.bsky.social. I always thought the right frame was the trade-off between (formal) sovereignty and living standards, and we emphasised that from the start. But the Leave campaign was effective with 'wrong then, wrong now' and so forth 1/ blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...

Economic hubris, political nemesis
There was another mismatch too. Economists believed they were answering the central question facing the country: would Brexit make the country more or less prosperous?

Many voters were asking a different question altogether. Who should make UK laws? How should immigration be controlled? What kind of country do we want to be?

These are not questions that economics can settle, nor should it pretend to. Looking back, one of our mistakes was to assume that because the economic consequences were important, they would also be decisive.

Did Brexit make us better at communicating economics? Despite a near consensus on the negative economic consequences of leaving the EU, this message did not land. @econromesh.bsky.social on whether we have learned how Brexit reshaped public engagement with research for @lseimpactblog.bsky.social

Did Brexit make us better at communicating economics? - LSE Impact

The referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU was a watershed moment for research communication. Despite a near total academic consensus on the negative economic consequences of a vote to Leave,…

blogs.lse.ac.uk