Ed Ng

@edng.bsky.social

Retired GP. Keen tennis and chess player

"Europe has never been serious about stopping migration", says Camilla Long in an entirely research-free piece. She claims that Spain/the EU are lying about the fact that most people in Ceuta have returned to Morocco. www.thetimes.com/comment/colu...

Ceuta is what happens when you’re not serious about migration

Ursula von der Leyen doesn’t seem to care about the tide of people rushing the Spanish border. Voters in Britain will

thetimes.com

(4/4). But politically one key advantage. As HO source implies, drives wedge between those who are (or claim to be) worried about benefit access & those who want "remigration", whose primary motivation is racism and ethnonationalism. The reaction to this will therefore be revealing.. (4/4)

A source said: “What it boils down to is benefits. You would allow them to get ILR after five years but you don’t allow them to claim benefits until three or four years later.” They said “most people don’t come here so they can claim benefits”, but the idea that they can do so “as soon as they get ILR” was “politically damaging”.

Andy Burnham, please read this piece by @danneidle.bsky.social www.thetimes.com/money/tax/ar.... Get rid of Business rates, Stamp duty and Council tax, which are all Bad Taxes. Tax instead Not Property value, but tax Land value- an important distinction which will not discourage housebuilding

Andy Burnham’s land value tax is the right idea. Let me explain

If he has the guts this plan would fuel growth, kill off three awful taxes and make us all richer — even short-term losers like me

thetimes.com

Yesterday the Telegraph reported on my comments about air conditioning. The comment section is quite something. I have apparently become a hero of the anti net zero crowd by saying something what I think is sensible about air con. Allow me to point out three ironies in this 🧵

Bild

Excellent piece by @econromesh.bsky.social, explaining with illuminating clarity that "In an age when authority itself is contested, economists need to devote as much care to how evidence is communicated – and why it should be trusted – as they do to producing it in the first place"

John Springford@johnspringford.bsky.social · 4w ago

Interesting piece by @econromesh.bsky.social. I always thought the right frame was the trade-off between (formal) sovereignty and living standards, and we emphasised that from the start. But the Leave campaign was effective with 'wrong then, wrong now' and so forth 1/ blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...

Economic hubris, political nemesis
There was another mismatch too. Economists believed they were answering the central question facing the country: would Brexit make the country more or less prosperous?

Many voters were asking a different question altogether. Who should make UK laws? How should immigration be controlled? What kind of country do we want to be?

These are not questions that economics can settle, nor should it pretend to. Looking back, one of our mistakes was to assume that because the economic consequences were important, they would also be decisive.

"Badenoch said she would not accept candidates who believed in net-zero targets"- should the party leader select and shape the MPs in their own image and beliefs, whether that be net zero or another? What about the idea of a "broad church" www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...

Back net zero and I’ll reject you, Kemi Badenoch tells Tory MP hopefuls

Conservative leader says even former ministers could struggle to meet her requirements for candidates at the next election

thetimes.com