Emory Richardson

@emoryrchrdsn.bsky.social

cognitive scientist. intuitive theories, collaboration, cumulative culture, networks, philosophy of science/mind/bio, language. Also kettlebells. past: @UMich @Yale @UChicago @stjohnscollege. https://rchrdsnemory.github.io/site/

Post coding agents, it's amazing to realize how "I need to do this myself because I know what I want" meant exactly the opposite. You did not know what you wanted, that's why you can't verbalize it. You only know that if you type and mechanically follow your intuition, you will get where you want.

We change constantly — new roles, new beliefs, new ways of seeing our past. Yet most of us feel like the same person over time. How? Brent Hughes and I explore this in our new paper in Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 🧵 www.cell.com/trends/cogni...

Wired for coherence: a network theory of self

People change across daily situations and life transformations, yet maintain a stable sense of self. Explaining this stability requires understanding how identities, traits, values, and memories inter...

cell.com

My thanks to the New Atlantis, letting me do this series on "How the System Works," and for removing the paywall today. It's maddening how little attention our society--and our political leaders, who take cues from us--pay to the systems that have made things better for so many billions.

How the System Works

A series on the hidden mechanisms that support modern life — and what happens if we don’t maintain them

thenewatlantis.com

How do people build new ideas from existing knowledge? By tracking Wikipedia searches, we found that novel ideas emerged when people balanced exploration with exploitation—alternating between distant topics and deep dives into related information.

Bild

4/ Here's the puzzle. Give young children two tests with the exact same logical structure — one outcome is guaranteed, the others are merely possible — and the same child can breeze through one and flounder on the other. Same logic, wildly different performance. Why?

"I used an LLM to help me write, but it was just to polish the style and grammar" is something you've probably come across, or done yourself. Many conferences and journals and teachers are ok with this. But does it...? Just focus on the style and grammar...?

Visiting my university’s new, expensively-refurbished space for startup incubators and senior management and cannot imagine a better illustration of the American university at this moment in time than a breathlessly press-released “collaboration room” featuring a single desk and chair.

A room labelled “collaboration room” featuring a single desk and chair.

What's more nonsensical: smashing a pumpkin using a number, or growing flowers inside a sneeze? Our paper on graded inconceivability is out now in Cognition! Come for the cognitive science 🧠🔍, stay for the whimsy 🌼🧚! 🔗Journal link: bit.ly/gradedInconCog

Tomer Ullman@tomerullman.bsky.social · last mo.

Now out (for realz) in Cognition: "People Make Graded Judgments About The Inconceivable" (by Hu, Sosa, & me) Free preprint: www.tomerullman.org/papers/grade... Journal link: bit.ly/gradedInconCog @jennhu.bsky.social @cognitionjournal.bsky.social

Results show a clean crossover: 🤖LLMs were more accurate on genuine riddles than riddle riddles (84.9% vs. 50.7%). 🧑Humans showed the opposite pattern (50.5% vs. 80.5%). ♟️We also found the same crossover in whether they used the correct reasoning strategy.

Bild

In this new JEP:General paper, we show that geometric shapes are organized as tree structures in a language of thought. We apply several linguistic tests for nested constituents, including structural ambiguity, constituent subparts, and syntactic movement, and find analogues in the visual domain.

Barbu Revencu@barbu-revencu.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Representations of geometric shapes have syntactic structure w/ @maxencepajot.bsky.social and @standehaene.bsky.social is out & open-access in JEP:General doi.org/10.1037/xge0.... For an overview, see thread below!

I'm with Aaron on this: virality is just a terrible epistemic criterion, and the way to fix this is for us collectively to learn that the socials are for fun & networking but mostly not for epistemics

Post nicht verfügbar.