So….read the piece. Whether one agrees or disagrees, or whether it’s another case of “stuck in the middle with you” (apologies to Gerry Rafferty), the authors provide a useful framing. Just as an example, if law can be thought of as architecture, what the hell kind of house has SCOTUS built?
Every now and then, I read something and think, "well shit, that's amazing." Usually, that piece in question will already have a built-in fanbase. But every now and then, I do some digging and see that it's flown under the radar. Such is the case with an article that's prompted me to ask . . .