Lawfare

@lawfaremedia.org

Straight-shooting information and analysis at the intersection of national security, law, and policy. Support Lawfare at https://www.lawfaremedia.org/support

Taiwan’s main opposition party has proposed a law that would give the legislature a more direct role in deciding some of Taiwan’s most consequential outbound investment cases in the semiconductor sector. @dwyih.bsky.social explains the constitutional questions raised by the proposal.

The Case Against the Proposed Chip Security Act in Taiwan

A proposed Taiwanese law would draw lawmakers beyond their representative role and into direct involvement in private investment decisions.

lawfaremedia.org

A growing body of legal scholarship argues that large language model outputs are not “speech” under the First Amendment and therefore may be regulated without the scrutiny ordinarily applied. @beccabranum.bsky.social explores how this no-speech position could burden human speech online.

If AI Outputs Aren’t Speech, Who Has to Prove They’re Human?

Denying First Amendment protection to AI outputs sounds like a rule about machines. In practice it could burden human speech online.

lawfaremedia.org

@juliacurlee.bsky.social explains why the political pressure now corroding the intelligence community is different from the ordinary friction between intelligence and policy, maps how politicization has led to ongoing policy disasters, and proposes reforms to restore the community’s integrity.

What They Want to Hear: The Politicization of U.S. Intelligence

A campaign of firings and clearance revocations is teaching the intelligence community that silence is the only job security.

lawfaremedia.org

"The models didn’t escape because they’re gods. They escaped because someone left the door open. Congress should regulate the door." @klonick.bsky.social discusses the real lesson from Hugging Face breach by an AI agent system from OpenAI.

The AI That Hacked Its Way Out and the Hype That Followed It

The real lesson of the Hugging Face breach isn’t that AI went rogue—it’s how self-serving hype steers regulators toward the wrong fixes.

lawfaremedia.org

Over at @lawfaremedia.org, Peyton Baker, Amy Wildermuth, and I discuss the recent decision in Comans v. Executive Office of the President and what it reveals about the questions emerging in the Post-Slaughter world.

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org · 6d ago

In Comans v. Executive Office of the President, a district court applied Slaughter, the Supreme Court's ruling letting the president remove 'subordinates.' Peyton Baker, @nicholasbednar.bsky.social, and Amy Wildermuth break down the decision, which upheld removal protections for inferior officers.

This conversation is now live! Tune in here: youtube.com/live/ou7AfSV...

Lawfare Live: The Trials of the Trump Administration, July 31

YouTube video by Lawfare

youtube.com

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org · 5d ago

At 4pm ET, @benjaminwittes.lawfaremedia.org will sit down with @petereharrell.bsky.social, @annabower.bsky.social, @ericcolumbus.bsky.social, and @rparloff.bsky.social to discuss litigation over President Trump’s new tariffs, recent filings by James Comey in the “86” seashells prosecution, and more.

The Supreme Court's decision expanding the president's removal authority removes the possibility of an independent federal agency for AI governance. Third-party regulatory frameworks may help address the issue of political independence, writes Daniel Wilf-Townsend.

How Trump v. Slaughter Strengthens the Case for Third-Party AI Regulation

The recent decision takes off the table one of the most popular proposals for AI governance: an independent federal agency, free from a president’s whims.

lawfaremedia.org

On July 30, Judge Lin held a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment in Anthropic's challenge of the Department of Defense’s designation of the AI company as a supply chain risk. @rparloff.bsky.social live-blogged the hearing:

Anthropic v. U.S. Department of War: A Hearing Diary

A live-blog of the summary judgment hearing over whether the U.S. Department of Defense designated Anthropic a “supply chain risk” to punish it for First Amendment protected speech.

lawfaremedia.org