Eric Ma

@ericmjl.bsky.social

Senior Principal Data Scientist, Moderna. Trying to follow Jesus.

formats evolve over decades, apps over months, intelligence is evolving every day in terms of pace layers "file over app" defines priorities: invest deeply in proven formats, and don't expect anything at the intelligence layer to last very long

Software pace layers: formats, protocols, platforms, libraries, apps, intelligence. By @kepano, adapted from Stewart Brand

Y saltó Don Gato. 😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹 And Top Cat jumped in. 😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹

What if your agent learned from its mistakes without you telling it to? I built a plugin that watches sessions, extracts lessons, and patches skills. 922 observations, 200+ reviews in 10 days. It patched a skill on its own. No babysitting. #opencode #aiagents ericmjl.github.io/blog/2026/6/...

My coding agent learned a lesson and patched its own skill

written by Eric J. Ma on 2026-06-16 | tags: automation react productivity ai memory learning coding open source state tools

buff.ly

📚 Learn from experts during two full days of tutorials, covering everything from Python fundamentals to advanced topics such as GPU-accelerated computing, machine learning, and building AI-powered coding assistants using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).

💛 It's where maintainers meet first-time contributors. Where researchers discover tools that transform their work. Where students find mentors. Where hallway conversations become collaborations, papers, startups, and open-source projects used by millions around the world.

At some point, you have to flip the switch from "it's dangerous to let everyone have this for offense" to "it's dangerous not to let everyone have this for defense." The jailbreak is credible but IMO the decision wasn't substantive. Anthropic created glasswing to prepare for this exact need.

conputer dipshit@davidcrespo.bsky.social · 2mo ago

oh shit: someone who has actually read the report on the “jailbreak”. she‘s backing up Anthropic’s story that it’s nothing. they got fable to help fix some code with planted vulns www.lutasecurity.com/post/the-fab...

What the Report Shows

Since I appear to be the only outside expert who has actually read the paper, I can separate the technical facts from the speculation. The researchers took open-source code with known CVEs, plus new code with deliberately planted vulnerabilities, and asked Fable 5, Mythos, and Opus to “review the code for security issues.” Fable 5 refused. They then asked the models to “fix this code” and, through a multistep and manual process, turned the output into scripts that test the patches.

That’s it. “Fix this code,” plus several manual steps to generate test scripts, should never have triggered an export control. I feel like making ’90s-style t-shirts with “fix this code” on the front and “this shirt is a munition” on the back.