Cat Hicks

@grimalkina.bsky.social

Author of The Psychology of Software Teams: https://www.drcathicks.com/#book she/her 🏳️‍🌈 Catharsis: https://catharsisinsight.com/ Host at: https://www.changetechnically.fyi/

Me, forever doomed to be the online parlance translator of the relationship, explaining what "to know ball" means to my wife Ashley: "so it's like 'do you know Dorothy'"

A lot of things that I'd learned were strategically necessary as a high level technical IC delivering evidence (being exceptionally warm, constantly placating egos with rapport building) suddenly flipped into severe penalties when I was a VP. It was interesting to observe

I was on The Product Experience talking about building coalitions on our teams, lowering threat temperatures, and of course, the understanding that psychology can bring to your development work. Watch or listen: www.mindtheproduct.com/inside-the-m...

What your developers aren't telling you - Cat Hicks (Psychologist)

Dr Cat Hicks is a psychological scientist and the founder of Catharsis, a human-centred research consultancy that works with engineering organisations....

mindtheproduct.com

So 16 days ago I wrote this thread and shared this example of using structured approaches like my informed-patient to quickly run a literature + clinical guidance review for a loved one going through cancer (which I did while I was on the phone with them)

Cat Hicks@grimalkina.bsky.social · 2w ago

An example of me working the problem is in the informed-patient skill I wrote. I will continue with this very serious example, and give you a different user you might not believe in, someone pretty skilled with evidence. I wrote this query the way *I* would write it, into *my* evidence harness

Let's use the informed-patient skill to help me understand what to watch for as the caregiver for someone on EV chemo for their bladder cancer. I'm concerned about adverse reactions, and their specific risks (run the patient inventory and I will tell you their details). I'd like you to run a literature review especially because this treatment is relatively new, and I need to assess the strength of the research on patients and the safety profile here and what we can do to minimize adverse effects throughout the chemo

Boosting this specifically because my mom just told me she's been searching bsky for mentions of my book 😅 so thank you @hazelweakly.me

Hazel Weakly@hazelweakly.me · 2d ago

This is what most “state of the art” developer experience research sounds like (Which is why @grimalkina.bsky.social’s book stands out so much. I’ll write a review on it soon, but it’s delightful and should be required reading for anyone director and higher in a company)

We need to get a handle on how this "coding" thing is creating addiction patterns. Some of my friends spend their nights and weekends on it. It's getting in between them and their families and social lives. They're even defining other people's worth solely in terms of how much those people code??

The conversation about AI in health stuff is always about the risks of patients using AI. I'm more worried about possibilities like every appointment gets inspected by an insurance company in detail so that if a patient uses the slightly wrong words about something their care is denied.

It's nice that The Odyssey is getting its day in the sun as a synecdoche for history. But when this summer is over, it's back to the relentless, remorseless rise of Jane Austen.

Google Ngram Viewer chart comparing the frequency of “Jane Austen” and “The Odyssey” in English-language books from 1800 to 2022. Both phrases are rare before the mid-nineteenth century. Mentions of “Jane Austen” rise sharply after about 1860, fluctuate through the twentieth century, and then climb steeply after 1990 to roughly 0.000075% by 2020. “The Odyssey” increases more gradually, reaching about 0.000020% by 2020.

I feel that when you love someone who's going through chemo the healthcare system tells you a lot about the cancer stuff and next to nothing about adverse reactions and what to do about them and this seems pretty flawed to me

Hello. If you struggle with maladaptive overachievement, and anxiety about productivity, and you experience relief at the sensation of productivity and difficulty regulating your behavior around demands for you to be productive, that doesn't make you a bad person, and that is not addiction.

"an AI-assisted condition (𝑛 = 55), where participants were allowed to use an embedded LLM (gpt-4o-mini) in whatever way they chose while writing." I just don't find Prolific samples told to basically do whatever copy paste they want very informative design for motivated writing

Eugene Vinitsky 🍒@eugenevinitsky.bsky.social · 5d ago

Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161

I'm so glad I was able to make this. These topics, affirming and defending our humanity in tech and bringing better psychology into our software engineering communities just... I feel a very profound source of joy within these conversations that I just want to hang on to and linger within.

Cat Hicks@grimalkina.bsky.social · last wk.

SEATTLE friends: Cat-in-real-life alert! I am in Seattle this week and decided to host a small (limited spots) Psychology of Software Teams happy hour this thursday July 30th, 4-6pm. RSVP here for location & to secure a spot: luma.com/lxcmtn68

Ashley and I were trying to decide whether we wanted to see the Odyssey and as the social media translator in our relationship I had to do a whole run-down of why she was seeing so many confusing posts about it and by the time I got to the end of that I was like, I do not want to see this anymore

Whataboutism is indeed annoying but I don't see this sort of unproductive exchange that way when the fundamental question of "what is the rule here" seems to not be established. That's what makes people feel like the rule is selective, because it's not invoked on examples in the same category

Molly Crabapple@mollycrabapple.bsky.social · 7d ago

99% of the time, when someone accuses you of selective outrage, it’s a way of politically demobilizing you and shutting you up “Why are you angry about data centers instead of fast fashion” isn’t about making you care about fast fashion. It’s about shutting you up about data centers And visa versa

You know that trend where women on social media find the mom of a guy who is sending them terrible comments and show the mom the comments, I'm going to do that but it's going to be finding the daughters of the retired men of tech who pile into my mentions