Exile To Mars

@exiletomars.bsky.social

She/her I make music with synthesizers sometimes and I like Polaroids. I am an adult with a supposedly fully developed prefrontal cortex. https://linktr.ee/exiletomars

not only does this piece not cite a single fact re: the many potential benefits of kratom, there is no indication that the author has ever spoken to someone who has as much as tried it. And certainly no perspective from the many people who are living pain and drug free because of it.

One more thing: the author acknowledges that the AKA is only advocating for natural kratom & supports banning synthetics, but wantonly conflates the two. She then tries to suggest that McCurdy knows that natural kratom may be fatal. Click through to learn that this is in possibly 36 cases. 36.

Anyway, I didn't know who Christopher McCurdy was before I read this and I'm not defending him here. I have been interested in kratom's potential for many years and happen to know a lot about it; obviously I have a bias here. But this is a really strange choice of inaugural kratom pieces for PP

Just as a comp I just went looking and can't find a single hit piece about George Ricaurte, a man who somehow still has a job at Johns Hopkins after doing NOTHING with his entire career but produce debunked research on behalf of the DEA to justify criminalization of psychedelics (inter alia)

the main point appears to be that this researcher has not disclosed industry ties, which is unfortunately fairly common across the world of scientific research as I understand it. I have no problem with keeping this man honest, but I do really have one with how is work is characterized in this

there is a direct analogue here between natural cannabis sativa and the extremely harmful synthetic K2/"spice" which appeared in the vacuum created by the criminalization of marijuana. It's fairly 1:1, except that synthetic kratom products are much worse health.clevelandclinic.org/dangers-of-s...

The Dangers of Synthetic Weed

Synthetic weed is often falsely marketed as a “safer” alternative to natural marijuana. Our addiction psychiatrist explains why the chemical creation may actually be more dangerous.

health.clevelandclinic.org

First, the piece essentially handwaves away the *extremely vital* difference between healthy natural kratom and deadly synthetics. The first sentence sets the tone by calling it "a substance that has left a trail of death and addiction around the world" w/o making that distinction at all

this is the first time in my life that I have finished a ProPublica article and had a strong urge to write a comprehensive response to it. Nothing against this reporter or PP generally, but this story with this angle at this time is truly (as the kids say) not it. A few points:

You know that the zeitgeist around kratom is *dire* when ProPublica is carrying the DEA's water! This is the only story PP has ever published on anything relating to kratom, and it is absurdly prohibitionist. We are about to make the same mistake with mitragyna speciosa that we made with cannabis.

Anjeanette Damon@anjeanette-damon.bsky.social · 4d ago

The kratom industry spends heavily lobbying states & Congress to keep the psychoactive plant available in gas stations and smoke shops. It enlisted the help of the foremost kratom researcher who hasn't been open about his financial ties to the industry. My latest: www.propublica.org/article/krat...

🚨BREAKING: Our union of over 12,000 baristas are officially calling for a Starbucks boycott. Read this statement penned by Starbucks workers on why a boycott from ALL customers, allies, and organizations is necessary to fight back against corporate greed:

BOYCOTT STARBUCKS is written inside a zig-zaggy speech bubble against crumbled paper. Beside it are the Starbucks Workers United logo and an image of a coffee cup being poured out.We, the 12,000 and growing members of Starbucks Workers United, call on everyone who stands with working people to boycott Starbucks until they finalize a contract with union baristas and stop union-busting.
What we’re fighting for is simple: a minimum $17/hr wage, enough hours to live on, better staffing in our stores, and basic workplace protections. Every year, our living costs rise but our wages don’t keep up – a growing pressure many American workers are feeling as corporate greed accelerates unchecked in our country. 
Starbucks is banking on customers' blind loyalty to the integrity and values this company once stood for in order to keep squeezing them for profits. At a time when working-class people across the country are struggling in a challenging economy, it is no longer possible to be both a Starbucks customer and in support of workers; choosing to spend money at Starbucks is choosing a law breaking corporation over the baristas who make your coffee everyday exactly as you ask for it.
Starbucks has violated U.S. labor law more than any other company in modern history–the NLRB and its judges have found that Starbucks committed hundreds of labor violations and there are currently more than 550 unresolved unfair labor practice charges still pending against the company. Instead of finalizing a fair and reasonable union contract, Starbucks has repeatedly demonstrated a lack of care for the workers who fuel the company’s profits by wasting millions of dollars on AI and technology that doesn’t work, launching countless gimmicky drinks designed to distract from real problems, and inventing pointless policies that do nothing but make our jobs harder. 
This ongoing, irrational behavior by Starbucks and its refusal to settle a fair union contract with workers leaves us with no other choice than to call for a boycott. We know when working people stand up together, we win. 
No Contract? No Coffee.

I wish more of my friends actually listened to my music and told me about it, or even shared it with people. Like, I try to be supportive of friends who do artistic stuff, and I feel like I don't get any sort of reciprocal support and it relly hurts and makes me feel like my music sucks.