David Kerstetter, Ph.D.

@fishguydave.bsky.social

NSU Fisheries & Avian Ecology Lab PI. Proud 3x W&M grad. Posts on non-biology topics too, especially regarding academia and enviro/ed politics. Opinions solely my own.

At what point does the public need to consider that the Occam’s Razor explanation for flips like Sen Cornyn isn’t financial self-interest but something more insidious? I’d personally not do a lot of votes otherwise repugnant, unless it involved the safety (or especially *life*) of my children.

Today, August 4, 2026, is the setting of Ray Bradbury’s short story “There Will Come Soft Rains” about a fully automated house continuing on after the family who lived there and the world around it died in a nuclear blast.

Nature did a short piece on our preprint about how LLMs will affect the practice of science; my more detailed thread is below.

Scientists using LLMs will ‘do more, less well’, modelling study predicts

Research suggests that the combination of incentives to publish and the use of large language models will lead to more papers, but they will be less refined.

nature.com

Carl T. Bergstrom@carlbergstrom.com · 2w ago

1. We—@eduede.bsky.social, @mjcrockett.bsky.social, Kevin Gross, and I—have a new preprint on the arXiv today, based on ideas that emerged during an @sfiscience.bsky.social workshop in November 2024: The unintended consequences of large language models as a labor-augmenting technology in science.

I’ve worn both military and scientific hats, so I think about this in more personal terms than most on my field. That said, a government that doesn’t consider the long-term effects of its military actions absolutely doesn’t care one whit about the long-term effects of its science policy choices.

Dead Carl@deadcarl.bsky.social · 2w ago

In light of the war with Iran escalating to targeting desalination plants, I've chosen to look at what Clausewitz wrote on the distinction (or lack thereof) between wars of civilized peoples and those of the "uncivilized." www.deadcarl.com/p/barbarity-...

If there was any remaining doubt that political considerations didn’t affect funding and other decisions about science at the US federal level, this (mal)Administration has smashed it into oblivion. Become active in your own future.

Jenna Norton@jenna-m-norton.bsky.social · 2w ago

9 lessons from Bethesda Declaration organizers on how to rescue US science: www.ovid.com/jnls/dartmou... 1. Scientists can no longer safely claim the privilege of being outside of, or above, politics 2. Inaction can be riskier than action. 3. Progress requires work. 4. Do not wait for someone else.

Scientists--if your funding was cut over the last year (for research on climate, global health, DEI, LGBTQ or womens health, etc) but you managed to keep the research going, I want to talk to you for an upcoming article! Plz contact me: gewin at me dot com. Re-posts appreciated!

At 20+ years, I’m not yet willing to consider myself a Florida Man, but my two kids have been born here and grown up hiking the Everglades and swimming our mangroves and reefs. I can indeed consider myself sufficiently Floridian without supporting our Tallahassee overlords.

Katelyn Burns@katelynburns.com · last mo.

I'd be interested in some thoughts from Americans on here on an idea: Over the last 5 years, have you found yourself identifying more with your home state than the US as a whole over time?

What a great article not only on faculty workloads, but how little our salaries actually factor in to most university budgets. A few highlights. First, our salaries are falling:

Third, faculty salaries are falling even if we statistically control for faculty rank and institution. By our analysis of National Center for Education Statistics data, tenured and tenure-track salaries are down 10 percent in real terms since 2016 and are lower today than they were in 2002; nontenured faculty salaries are down 4 percent since 2016 and are at 2002 levels today.

To put this plainly: Suppose sharply increased teaching loads enabled institutions to cut one out of every seven full-time faculty. (That’s roughly what we saw last year in severe cuts announced at West Virginia, Western Illinois, and St. Cloud State Universities.) The associated savings in salary and benefits even through such drastic action would amount to less than 2.5 percent of total institutional expenditures for the typical university.

The upshot? If you think higher education has a cost problem, squeezing more teaching out of faculty is not the first place you should look.

Everyone that ever interacts with federal employees should know this is the future under this (mal)Administration. We’ve now effectively returned to the spoils system that the US government fought to abolish almost a century ago.

Alt CDC (they/them)@altcdc.altgov.info · last mo.

1/3 More evidence that, contrary to what Sean Slovenski (our new COO) told us at all-hands, what we're experiencing is not “normal.” OPM has finalized a policy expanding oversight and pathways for removing federal employees.

I hope that all the remaining high-ranked teams in the World Cup take home the GER lesson from today — win so convincingly that a referee’s call won’t matter or you might lose. Coincidentally, the same lesson that the Democratic Party should be following.