Tessera
Folgen

Hu Chuan-Peng

@hcp4715.bsky.social

Self cognition | computational modelling | meta-science, open science, diversity| amateur climber. @School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University

261 Posts1508 Follower2026 Folgt
Alex Holcombe@alexh.bsky.social · 2d ago

What explainer/resource do you direct researchers to when they conclude the null hypothesis is true on the basis of not rejecting it? It ought to mention that possible solutions include equivalence testing (or just interpreting the confidence interval) and Bayes factors. Maybe just "ask AI".

Open Access Tracking Project@oatp.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy · 2d ago

How preprints accelerate the time to first citation of the subsequent journal articles? | Scientometrics | Springer Nature Link https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-026-05758-z

How preprints accelerate the time to first citation of the subsequent journal articles? - Scientometrics

This study examines whether journal articles with preprints are cited more rapidly than those without preprints. We construct a matched sample of articles published in the same journal, year, volume, and issue to ensure comparability between articles with and without preprints. Survival analysis is employed to estimate the temporal advantage of articles with preprints in receiving the first citation relative to those without preprints, while OLS regression quantifies this advantage in terms of days. The key findings are as follows: (1) articles with preprints have a 35.2% higher hazard of receiving their first citation than those without preprints; (2) among articles that received at least one citation during the observation period, articles with preprints were associated with a 69.042-day shorter time to first citation than comparable articles without preprints; (3) both early visibility and the additional dissemination channels of preprint platforms are associated with a shorter time to first citation, with early visibility showing a relatively stronger association. Notably, these estimates reflect conditional associations rather than causal effects, given the observational design.

link.springer.com

Ian Hussey@ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 2d ago

New Jingle assessment: we show that the "Perspective Taking Protocol" has very poor reliability and near-zero convergent validity with other nominal measures of emotional and spatial perspective taking, empathy, and theory of mind. w/ @malte.the100.ci

Bild
PsyArXivBot@psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 5d ago

The RFT Perspective Taking Protocol has very poor reliability and convergent validity with other measures of perspective taking, empathy, and theory of mind: A jingle assessment: https://osf.io/jb6c4

Daniel Lakens@lakens.bsky.social · 3d ago

In the last 2 years I (and our lovely collaborators) have been rather obsessively working on Metacheck - a tool to automatically check best practices in papers. In this RIOTS summerschool talk, I walk you through what the tool can do, and future plans www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWd2...

Metacheck: automatically check papers for best practices - Daniel Lakens

Can automated tools help researchers catch problems before their work is published? In this talk from the King’s Open Research Summer School 2026, Professor Daniël Lakens (Eindhoven University of…

youtube.com

Eiko Fried@eikofried.bsky.social · 2d ago

Had the privilege to give a #SAA2026 keynote today. Showed early results from WARN-D ML competition, & EMA'd the audience on how different parts of the data—Baseline, EMA, Wearables, & Followup—contributed to predicting depression onset, with live leaderboard & two prizes. Got 220 live responses:

Bild
Alex Holcombe@alexh.bsky.social · 2d ago

This practice is happening on a large scale! :( Confuses me that it's called a mill, though,which sounds like something organised, when it seems to just be individual researchers accepting a lot of review requests and asking to be cited.

Katherine Stiles@katherinestiles.org · 2d ago

· #AcademicSky · #AcademicPublishing · #ReviewMills · Review mills — researchers who write fake referee reports with coercive citation requests — are setting off a war in academic publishing. What happens to those caught in the middle?

Saloni@scientificdiscovery.dev · last wk.

I'm interested in finding and potentially supporting people who are interested in doing long-form writing on the big efforts in global health: Gavi, Global Fund, PEPFAR, etc. If this is you or someone you know, please make yourself known!

Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)@improvingpsych.org · 6d ago

Are you ready to shape the future of psychological science? SIPS Executive Committee nominations are still open!🗳️ We are electing 3 seats for 2027–2030: 🔹 Graduate Student or Post-doc 🔹 Faculty (or equivalent) outside the US/Canada 🔹 Faculty or equivalent career stage, including “alt-ac” positions

SIPS Executive Committee Nominations 2026

We are currently soliciting nominations for the Executive Committee of the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. Any member may be nominated, and self-nominations are welcome. SIPS…

docs.google.com

Nature Human Behaviour@nathumbehav.nature.com · 6d ago

A life-course map of health risks associated with exposure to second-hand smoke

A life-course map of health risks associated with exposure to second-hand smoke

Nature Human Behaviour, Published online: 31 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02481-wWe synthesized evidence from 111 meta-analyses to map the comprehensive health risks that are associated with second-hand smoke exposure (SHSE) throughout the life course. Our analyses confirm the strong association of SHSE with lung cancer, cardiovascular disease and a range of adverse fetal and child health outcomes. Moreover, we identify research gaps that should be addressed to inform targeted tobacco control.

dlvr.it

Julia M. Rohrer@dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 6d ago

New blog post! Odds ratios are...a bit weird. Here I explain two problems (interpretation, non-collapsibility) and provide some simple recommendations for improved reporting. www.the100.ci/2026/07/30/r...

Reviewer notes: Odds ratios are really odd

When psychological researchers investigate binary outcomes, they routinely report odds ratios to quantify the strength of an effect or an association. This is quite understandable given that psycholog...

the100.ci

Julia M. Rohrer@dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 6d ago

The within-person associations aren’t necessarily causal because of time-varying confounding, which is something we discuss here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10..... However, we didn’t discuss the scenario of interpreting the between-person associations causally, because that’s…an interesting move

These Are Not the Effects You Are Looking for: Causality and the Within-/Between-Persons Distinction in Longitudinal Data Analysis - Julia M. Rohrer, Kou Murayama, 2023

In psychological science, researchers often pay particular attention to the distinction between within- and between-persons relationships in longitudinal data a...

journals.sagepub.com

Alex Holcombe@alexh.bsky.social · last wk.

We looked at all 255 articles of animal models of opiod addiction in leading journals 2019 to 2023. Zero preregistered, and zero shared their analysis code. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

How Transparent and Reproducible Are Studies That Use Animal Models of Opioid Addiction?

This study assessed transparency, reproducibility and bias minimization practices in animal models of opioid addiction research from 2019 to 2023. Key indices included analysis script sharing, prereg...

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Mark Rubin@markrubin.bsky.social · last wk.

"Enforcement, rather than an intrinsic motivation, led Swiss animal researchers to preregister." New study by Cristina Priboi et al. #MetaSci

A survey of researchers’ attitudes to preregistration in animal research reveals multiple perceived barriers to adoption

Preregistration is a promising and potentially impactful Open Science practice, but remains uncommon in animal research. This survey of animal researchers’ experiences, attitudes and barriers toward p...

doi.org

Our World in Data@ourworldindata.org · last wk.

We have a new Economic Inequality topic page— Public attention to economic inequality has grown a lot over the last twenty years. At the same time, the available data has greatly improved too: it now covers many more countries and longer time periods, and is more comparable and accessible than ever

Dot-and-line chart of monthly income or consumption at the 90th and 10th percentiles for selected countries, where it illustrates large gaps between the richest and poorest 10%. It shows the richest 10% in the United States at about $5,508 per person per month versus $789 for the poorest 10%, and smaller absolute amounts but clear gaps in Brazil (about $1,626 vs $161), Vietnam (about $875 vs $177) and Madagascar (about $156 vs $32). Data source: World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2026). License: CC BY to Our World in Data.
Michèle Nuijten@michelenuijten.bsky.social · last wk.

Very happy that my project about "gaming" automated peer review tools has been awarded an NWO XS grant 🤩 🤸‍♀️ We know that peer review is overburdened, so could we use automated tools to help out? ... maybe, but one of the things we still don't know much about is the risk of "gaming" these tools.