holly jean buck

@hollyjeanbuck.bsky.social

energy & climate policy, writer, analyst

where else can you push back on job-eating algorithms, deep fakes, and autonomous drones? in the workplace, with your union? the school board? with your electeds? with local journalism? in your living room? all of these would be more effective & durable than broad moratoria on data centers

Astra Taylor@astra.bsky.social · 5mo ago

The anti-data center movement isn’t just about limiting local development—it represents a new front in the fight against tech-enabled authoritarianism. Where else can people push back on job-eating algorithms, distorting deep fakes, and autonomous drone strikes? www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

I did a lengthy interview with the CEO of Stardust, in which he walked back the solar geoengineering startup's testing and deployment plans a bit. The company also intends to release details about its proprietary particles early next year and expects to open a US office soon.

How one controversial startup hopes to cool the planet

And why many scientists are freaked out about the first serious for-profit company moving into the solar geoengineering field.

technologyreview.com

📱Nearly half of US teens say they use the internet “almost constantly.” 😰 Climate anxiety is growing – in one study, more than 45% of young adults said that climate anxiety was impacting their daily life. Is there a relationship between social media use and climate distress? new paper on this 👇

Bild

Is massive unemployment from AI just hype, or a real threat? AI companies are going to overhype their products - but the risk is real. Why progressives can't miss the opportunity to lead on policy solutions -> new from me & the excellent @matthuber.bsky.social jacobin.com/2025/07/arti...

AI-Driven Worker Displacement Is a Serious Threat

By many estimates, the increasing use of artificial intelligence is set to produce significant job losses. The prospect of serious disruption demands that we start formulating egalitarian policy solut...

jacobin.com

I asked ChatGPT 4o what I should work on and it said I should write something on "'Carbon Colonialism Revisited: The New Scramble for Geochemical Space' – a geopolitical analysis of CDR land/sea use." I asked it if "geochemical space" was a thing or if it just made it up. it made it up

BildBild

one of the strangest things about this new government website, which states that "Public health officials often mislead the American people," is that Trump was president for like the first year of this pandemic

Princess Vimentin PhD | Cancer Biologist@princess-vimentin.bsky.social · last yr.

🧪Holy shit. The Covid.gov website directs to the WH website claiming that covid came from a lab leak. And they are blaming Anthony Fauci. And calling the NIH a failure. I am utterly speechless. Anti-science propaganda running its wheels in real time.

If you want a sense for what the admin intends for higher ed writ large, read the DOJ's letter to Harvard demanding that departments be externally audited and reformed for faculty "viewpoint diversity". glad Harvard is standing up - finally. great to see the Cambridge city council engaged too.

Niko Bowie@nikobowie.bsky.social · last yr.

An email from Harvard University President Alan Garber to the university community, titled "The Promise of American Higher Education," links to the DOJ's letter and Harvard's response: www.harvard.edu/research-fun... www.harvard.edu/research-fun...

Dear Members of the Harvard Community,
 
For three-quarters of a century, the federal government has awarded grants and contracts to Harvard and other universities to help pay for work that, along with investments by the universities themselves, has led to groundbreaking innovations across a wide range of medical, engineering, and scientific fields. These innovations have made countless people in our country and throughout the world healthier and safer. In recent weeks, the federal government has threatened its partnerships with several universities, including Harvard, over accusations of antisemitism on our campuses. These partnerships are among the most productive and beneficial in American history. New frontiers beckon us with the prospect of life-changing advances—from treatments for diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and diabetes, to breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, quantum science and engineering, and numerous other areas of possibility. For the government to retreat from these partnerships now risks not only the health and well-being of millions of individuals but also the economic security and vitality of our nation.
 
Late Friday night, the administration issued an updated and expanded list of demands, warning that Harvard must comply if we intend to “maintain [our] financial relationship with the federal government.” It makes clear that the intention is not to work with us to address antisemitism in a cooperative and constructive manner. Although some of the demands outlined by the government are aimed at combating antisemitism, the majority represent direct governmental regulation of the “intellectual conditions” at Harvard.
 
I encourage you to read the letter to gain a fuller understanding of the unprecedented demands being made by the federal government to control the Harvard community. They include requirements to “audit” the viewpoints of our student body, faculty, staff, and to “reduc[e] the power” of certain students, faculty, and …