James Temple

@jtemple.bsky.social

Climate and energy editor, Reno bureau chief, MIT Technology Review. Ski bum. Dog dad. Please send tips (not PR pitches) through Signal: jtemple.99

🚨 Journalism Jobs Alert 🚨 @sfgate.com, the largest media site in Calif., is once again HIRING! Looking for: - ✍️ Deputy Managing Editor, News Division - 🌲 North Coast Contributing Editor (part-time) - 📹 Social Video Producer (part-time) Quick 🧵 on what we're looking for 👇

2026 El Niño models continue their inexorable march upwards. CanSIPS (which used to be among the cooler ones!) released their August runs today, and now show a Nov/Dec peak of 3.6C (CanESM5) and 4.2C (GEM-NEMO). For reference, the prior record El Niño peaked at 2.8C.

Bild

Refusing to platform cranks is a core value that journalism must embrace. I've come across lots of, 'I'll just ask them tough questions folks in my career,' including a former boss. But by handing them your megaphone, you've already signaled that their's is a perspective worthy of consideration.

[Christopher M. Federico]@chrispps.bsky.social · last wk.

this sounds elitist but our recovery from the present moment will depend in part on being able to once again effectively malign, ostracize, and refuse a platform to cranks

Also thrilled to announce that Natalie Portman is developing my short story "Constellations" for film, thru her MountainA production company. I'm psyched at the prospect of her starring in it. "Constellations" appeared in the MIT Technology Review earlier this year (see today's pinned post for link)

I'll bite: Leaving aside geoengineering, the arguments here that climate change won't be catastrophic because we can adapt our way out of the problem strikes me as somewhere between absurd and offensive if you — as you must — take into account the developing world.

Oliver Morton, Eater of Sun@eaterofsun.bsky.social · 2w ago

I should probably write a thread in response to my friend @tednordhaus.bsky.social's geoengineering piece but I am finding it hard to kick it up the to to list. 20 likes for this post will guarantee a thoughtful response within a few days, week tops. www.breakthroughjournal.org/p/why-i-oppo...

green hydrogen costs $4–12/kg to produce. hunting for natural hydrogen has attracted $400 million+ with little to show for it. now, a new class of startups says it can engineer the subsurface to generate hydrogen for under $1/kg -- no electrolyzers, fossil fuels, or natural deposits required

The Next Big Thing in Hydrogen

“Geologic hydrogen” companies make up a hefty portion of the latest Activate Fellowship class, announced Tuesday morning — a reliable harbinger of investments to come.

heatmap.news

Tomorrow is the deadline for submitting a comment to stop the administration from dismantling U.S. science. There are nearly 280,000 public comments filed so far! But! Do not assume they are all, or even most, against the proposal. This is a key pillar of Project 2029 - wind down federal R&D.

Costa Samaras@costasamaras.com · 4w ago

Here’s a great resource to help write a comment this weekend before the deadline, by @colesci.bsky.social and @cdelawalla.bsky.social: www.standupforscience.foundation/policy-and-a...

Correct your priors: Private money is going after clean energy, governments are using public money to prop up fossil fuels "About 59% of all money spent on the fossil fuel system came from taxpayers in 2015. By 2025, that climbed to 68% and spiked at 78% in 2022." www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...

Who’s Really Keeping Fossil Fuels Alive? Taxpayers

To judge by the way many people discuss the energy transition, we’re engaged in a fight between green idealogues in government and academia on the one hand, and a more realistic private sector that re...

bloomberg.com

Remember the global climate goal of no hotter than 1.5°C? Climate change plus a very powerful El Niño could lead to the first month with a global average temperature above 2°C early next year.

Global Surface Temperature — North American Multi-Model Ensemble initialized 2026-06-01
University of Miami Cooperative Institute for Marine & Atmospheric Studies/NOAA
Y-axis "difference from 1850-1900 average (°C)
X-axis: June 2025-April 2026: Dotted line ranging from 1.1C to 1.4C
X-axis: June 2026-Feb. 2027: Average model runs show 1/8C in early 2027. Several individual model runs pass 2C beginning in October 2026.