Jack Meraxes 🍉

@jackmeraxes.bsky.social

Trans/Queer/Disabled/Bipolar/C-PTSD/Muslim/Socialist | he/him | All things strive | In recovery | Cat dad | Discworld & Tolkien enthusiast | Swears a lot | We get through this together, or not at all Occupied Wabanaki land 🇵🇸 Free Palestine 🇵🇸

National security decision-making has a longer time horizon. It would be stupid for Canada, Europe, South Korea, etc. to act now based on assuming the US will be a reliable in a decade. We have shown that we are not. Many Americans still don’t appreciate how profound of a change that is.

Used facial recognition on some unsuspecting dude, gassed him up by pretending to admire his work, and recorded the interaction with his pervert glasses. Easily the most cynical thing I’ve seen in a long while.

Influencers Are Using Meta's AI-Glasses to Film Manipulative Feel-Good Slop of People in Public

A content creator is using facial recognition software paired with Meta's AI glasses to film "joybait" of people without their knowledge.

futurism.com

My name is RaeRae. Three years ago, I was diagnosed with a rare form of lung cancer. I survived, but while healing, all I could think about was that I survived cancer to potentially spend the rest of my life growing old in a body that is not totally mine. Help me reach my goal?! gofund.me/11ec81bfc

Donate to Help RaeRae Alleviate Pain and Dysphoria, organized by Cat Thomas

Hello and welcome!! This is a fundraiser for my magical friend RaeRae, who I have … Cat Thomas needs your support for Help RaeRae Alleviate Pain and Dysphoria

gofund.me

One of the ways in which you can tell Americans *fundamentally* misunderstand transgender people, is that they keep telling lies about "tax payer funded sex changes." BITCH if it were THAT easy... Likewise, a lot of us never undergo bottom surgery for personal reasons as well. Country so dumb.

A little weird that the pro-AI position is that it could potentially kill all of humanity and the anti-AI position is that it definitely won't. FWIW I think there's a range of plausible outcomes for e.g. rogue AI hacking that are very bad even if you take human extinction off the table.

So when a Dem says they agree with any of this, they are taking a position that is against what trans people ALREADY HAD just 5 years ago. That's why trans people won't accept it. It's not about progress, it's about preventing a managed decline in civil rights agreed to by Democrats.

So when libs say, you need to do incremental progress like gay marriage, it completely ignores the rollbacks that have happened in 5 years. It is every aspect of trans life from where we use the bathroom, how we are addressed, what our IDs say, to even censorship on discussions about our existence.

Again, 5 years ago, none of these policies existed. 15 states require the forced outing of trans students 16 states ban medicaid coverage of gender affirming care 14 states have "Don't say trans" laws banning discussion of trans people's identities. 29 states have banned participation in sports.

BildBildBildBild

Cis people do not understand how much trans people's rights have regressed in just 5 years. 5 years ago, there were none of these restrictions. 19 states banned legal recognition 21 states have bathroom bans 8 states ban gender marker changes on DLs 25 ban gender affirming care for trans youth

BildBildBildBild

why is it not enough that vulnerable people must give up their rights for the greater good? why must they also accept their own sacrifice quietly and graciously? ask yourself if you would be so forgiving if you were the one expected to suffer for the greater good

"You just have to convince people." Dawg, there are a dozen conservative websites dedicated to spreading lies about trans people and billions in election spending. I just had to croundfund an outpatient surgery and I'm one of the biggest trans writers of our time.

I've found that this attitude goes hand in hand with a failure to realize that every single issue that is now labelled "radical trans activism" was a compromise trans people won with those in power that power is now reneging on.

One of the more insidious phrasings I've seen with the Dems/trans rights discourse lately is the idea that trans people are being greedy and demanding a "maximalist" approach to trans rights. No, you cannot call the state of rights American trans people had as recently as 2023 "maximalist," sorry.