James A. Palmer

@jamespqr77.bsky.social

Historian of medieval Italy; dad; cook; hockey fan, Michigander living in Iowa. Speaking solely for myself. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-9110

Since we are doing this discourse again: I probably talked to more undergraduates about grad school in the humanities than most people, as it’s part of my job as an advisor. My message: people do all kinds of shit in their 20s, and going to grad school aint the worst if you’re funded for it.

the red state version of acknowledging this problem is turning to “virtue” and “cultural literacy,” i’d love to see dems turn back to dewey a little, not in terms of “projects,” but in terms of the notion that experience is worth tending to even if it doesn’t affect test scores

It is precisely the people making a living by rolling their eyes at "standpoint epistemology" that most consistently catalogue the details of their own upbringing and identity before almost every piece.

fwiw I always rec taking a break between undergrad and grad school. doing so can help you realize later, if you do get a faculty gig in academia, that all workplaces are sort of hellscape microcosms of broader social issues and that higher ed isn't really unique in this regard.

"Just because a chatbot talks like a therapist doesn't mean it thinks like one. And just because something's cheap & always available doesn't mean it's safe. Guest: "Therapy requires a human-to-human connection... people want other people to care for and about them." www.forbes.com/sites/weskil...

Can We Build AI Therapy Chatbots That Help Without Harming People?

AI mental health chatbots promise affordable and immediate support—but can they be trusted? This Forbes report explores the risks, ethics, and future of therapy bots.

forbes.com

“I am losing precious days. I am degenerating into a machine for making money. I am learning nothing in this trivial world of men. I must break away and get out into the mountains to learn the news.” ~ John Muir (1838-1914) #Photography, John Muir.

Bild

Centrist Democrats hate humanities scholarship just as much as Republicans do - the difference is that Democrats think humanities teaching is important in the elite private institutions they aspire to send their kids to, but not the actual laborers.

Anyone who thinks the Democrats in their current form are going to rebuild the NEH at anywhere near what it needs to be to support the demand for humanistic knowledge is deluding themselves. When Axelrod talks about “zany, liberal faculty lounge exotica,” he means humanists, not STEM professors

Geoffrey Hughes@geofffhughes.bsky.social · 4d ago

We all know that class discourse is totally vibes-based in the Anglophone world, but so is educational attainment discourse (Hong is a college dropout):

David Axelrod

@davidaxelrod

Follow

It would be good for @AbdulElSayed if Francesca Hong loses her bid to become the Democratic nominee in Wisconsin next week. He is a serious person. She is a font of zany liberal, faculty lounge exotica.

But the Rs, hoping to deflect attention from an unpopular @POTUS who hangs from them like an anchor, would surely try and link Abdul and Hong as philosophical kin.

2:57 pm

06 Aug 26.

488K Views

699

110

1.3K

197

Working on courses with a supportive library staff — and a library with the resources to be supportive of teaching in a range of fields — opens doors for instructors and students. New kinds of class meeting, new kinds of assignment, new kinds of interaction become possible. Meanwhile there’s genAI.

The most consequential change I’ve experienced in moving from one university to another is that the library at my new place has a large physical collection and, for now at least, a budget for purchasing books. And the biggest effect of this change has been on my teaching, not my research.

Tobias Wilson-Bates@phdhurtbrain.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I fundamentally believe that higher ed reform needs to begin by protecting the mission and labor of libraries

the comparisons with Galileo that everyone is rushing to make are really interesting -- but not for the reasons that most people think the Galileo affair was not an instance of a heroic scientist falling victim to a an all-powerful Catholic Church monolithically committed to obscurity and dogma,

The Associated Press@apnews.com · 4d ago

BREAKING: A Senate committee votes to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress over his refusal to answer questions at COVID hearing.

There’s a story to be reported about the new Center for Humanities at UT Austin. It’s separate from the School of Civic Leadership. The tenure line hires appear to have been made by the Civitas Institute and the director + several faculty come from the Florida Hamilton School. @insidehighered.com

This is like a "choose your own adventure book". If you choose option A, it will do the next step for you, etc. This is not writing. This is producing text for a grade. Writing has value as a way to figure out what you think and why. If students see this possibility in a product that is/5

Good pick — that contradiction (faculty alarmed about student AI use while using it heavily themselves) gives you a real argument, not just a summary.

Working thesis: Something like — "Academic integrity frameworks built around detection and prohibition are failing because they ignore the double standard institutions themselves practice: faculty and universities are adopting AI in their own work while restricting it for students. A workable integrity model has to define legitimate use, not just police it."

Outline:

Intro — the contradiction as your hook (College Board: 45% of faculty view AI negatively on integrity grounds, yet 77% use it professionally)
What "academic integrity" meant pre-AI, and why detection-based enforcement (Turnitin-style) is breaking down
The faculty double standard — evidence and what it reveals about the real concern (is it dishonesty, or loss of skill-building?)
Counter-argument — the case for strict AI-use rules (Ecuador study: link between trusting AI output and plagiarism)
What's actually working — institutions shifting to "process tracking" / "learning assurance" instead of pure detection
Your argument for what a better policy looks like
Conclusion
For sources beyond the two I found, you'll want your own database search (JSTOR, Google Scholar) for peer-reviewed studies — I can help you evaluate sources once you have them, but a paper this current benefits from primary studies you've actually read, not just what I can find via web search.

Want me to help you draft the introduction next, or do you want to gather a few more sources first?