Jim McGrath

@jimmcgrath.bsky.social

Instructional Designer and college teacher in Greater Boston. yes i am a doctor. Hope everyone’s having a good day. https://linktr.ee/jimmc_grath

I curated some readings for class on "data tensions" and the list felt worth sharing. Come on a tour of datasets, books, the web, and AI with me... We'll start with this piece on the Google Books project: the hopes, dreams, disasters, and aftermath of building a public library on the internet. 1/n

Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria

“Somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them.”

theatlantic.com

Terry Belanger would begin his Rare Book School classes by physically destroying/dismantling a (well-chosen) old book. This is NOT the same as what Anthropic is doing! But there is a popular culture of preciousness around books that is belied by the material realities of their circumstances. +

Daniel Bellingradt@dbellingradt.bsky.social · 6d ago

AI companies scanning and shredding old and rare books is bad, but you should be aware that shredding new, old, and used books is an established practice of selling and marketing books. In fact, hundreds of millions of books are shredded every year discretly, and legally, in Europe alone. #booksky

This is the remarkable thinker & teacher whose Harvard role was just terminated--profiled in Harvard Magazine only 18 months ago. What is happening at the College this summer is awful (as with last summer, when the Women's Center was closed out of the blue). 🤯 www.harvardmagazine.com/2025/01/harv...

Harvard Writing Center’s Jane Rosenzweig on AI and Writing | Harvard Magazine

Harvard Writing Center’s Jane Rosenzweig on AI and writing

harvardmagazine.com

Mary Lewis@profmarylewis.bsky.social · last wk.

It‘s quite possible that with this move, @harvard.edu could become the only Ivy League university without a writing center. www.thecrimson.com/article/2026...

this news about CCCC (and the manner in which these plans were made) is unbelievable. My first experience at an academic conference was at C's (as an undergrad attendee in 2003!) and this network has been an invaluable resource for myself and many friends and colleagues over the years.

Megan McIntyre@rcmeg.bsky.social · 2w ago

The CCCC Exec Committee released a brief statement on the NCTE’s intention to dissolve CCCC. "CCCC is the professional home for thousands of scholars, teachers, and researchers...with a decades-long record of shaping how writing is taught, studied, and understood."

I am excited to read this! Sarah Ciston et al., Inventing ELIZA: How the First Chatbot Shaped the Future of AI, Software Studies (MIT Press, 2026), doi.org/10.7551/mitp... It has always interested me that the context for this early chatbot, in the 1960s, was health: of therapy and counseling.

Inventing ELIZA: How the First Chatbot Shaped the Future of AI

How the original ELIZA chatbot transformed ideas about AI and society’s response to them.As we reach the 60th anniversary of ELIZA’s public debut, Inventin

doi.org

Some faculty at my institution are looking for readings on AI implications for academic research workflows, particularly reflections from educators who have experimented, adopted, or critiqued these particular contexts. I have some links but if anyone has anything top-of-mind, I'd appreciate more!

I don't love any of these ideas but agree that we are in the midst of an "assessment crisis" in higher ed due to AI. Some of the proposals here favor investments in surveillance, misguided perceptions of "academic rigor," and inattentiveness to contexts like, say required courses outside of majors.

Neil Mosley@neilmosley.bsky.social · 2w ago

"In the past few years, the same things come up, such as the need to move to viva-style or in-person assessment, or authentic assessment..so far higher education has few genuine answers to the challenges that generative AI has presented."

The coverage on this OpenAI incident is abysmal. Use of the terms "rogue" and "loss of human control" lead to groupthink as people lack the critical skills to understand the difference between "autonomy" and faulty reward functions in AI on a task it was directed and given access to do.

the trick with reading Chronicle of Higher Ed pieces is to scroll down to the author info first and then decide whether you need to waste time getting mad about this person's perspective