Jonathan Schulman

@jonathanschulman.bsky.social

Research Associate @pewresearch.org | PhD @polisciatnu.bsky.social

For the first time in roughly two decades of Pew Research Center surveys, both Canadians and Mexicans now view China significantly more positively than the U.S. In 🇨🇦: 🇨🇳 44% favorable 🇺🇸 33% favorable In 🇲🇽: 🇨🇳 59% favorable 🇺🇸 40% favorable

Even when views of the U.S. declined last year, it was still generally rated higher than China. That's no longer the case. In most of the countries we surveyed in this year, China is now seen more positively than the U.S.

Bild

NEW: Our new 36-country survey finds declining ratings for the U.S. amid rising concerns about its foreign policy and the health of its democracy. Overall, a 36-country median of 23% have confidence in Trump, compared to 76% who do not.

Bild

Satisfaction with the way democracy is working didn't change much from last year in most of our surveyed countries. But there were four exceptions: In South Korea and Japan, satisfaction skyrocketed after a year filled with significant political change. In the U.S. and Australia, views worsened.

Bild

"Polls give the public a voice in politics, business and other areas... If we stop polling people and just assume AI knows the answer, we risk misunderstanding what’s actually happening in the public." www.pewresearch.org?p=303740

Q&A: Do AI and bogus respondents threaten polling’s future?

Courtney Kennedy, vice president of methods and innovation, answers some common questions about the current polling landscape in the U.S.

pewresearch.org

Republicans (47%) are much more likely than Democrats (5%) to say the U.S. military action against Iran will make the Iranian people better off. But within the GOP, there are big age divides. Republicans 65 and older are about twice as likely as those under 30 to say Iranians will be better off.

Bild

"Concomitant with the emergent partisan gap [in trust in science] is a massive perceptual gap among Democrats, who perceive a partisan divide more than double its actual size. Democrats vastly underestimate Republicans’ trust in scientists" academic.oup.com/poq/advance-...

Continuity and Change in Trust in Scientists in the United States: Demographic Stability and Partisan Polarization

Abstract. Americans’ trust in scientists has been stable and high, relative to other political and social institutions, for the last half century (Krause,

academic.oup.com

While there continues to be much attention paid to the growth of the religiously unaffiliated population in Europe and North America, two-thirds of the world’s 1.9 billion religious “nones” (67%) live in China.

1 country is home to 67% of all religiously unaffiliated people (and 18% of the world's population).

New research from the #NetSI team + colleagues shows: groups with historically lower trust—women, Black people, rural and lower-income residents—trust scientists more when they share their identity. Greater representation across communities can boost trust in science. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Representation in science and trust in scientists in the USA - Nature Human Behaviour

Druckman et al. document gaps in trust in scientists in the USA. People from groups less represented among scientists (for example, women and those with lower economic status) are less trusting. Incre...

tinyurl.com

We've previously found that trusting others is associated with things like higher confidence in public school principals and greater life satisfaction. In a new post out today, we find that whether people trust others also relates to how they think about international affairs.

Bild

Generally speaking, would you say that most people can or can't be trusted? In our new post out today, we asked this question in 25 countries. 55% of Americans say that most people CAN be trusted. The U.S. is consistent with a wider trend of people in high-income countries being more trusting.