Journal of Global Security Studies

@journalofgss.bsky.social

A journal of the International Studies Association (ISA). Publishes cutting-edge research on global security and global aspects of debates in security studies.

Our new article is out in the JoGSS! We look at why armed groups use extreme forms of violence like beheadings and find that irregular leadership successions are a big factor in explaining escalation to extreme tactics. But groups deescalate as new leaders consolidate power. It's open access👇

Journal of Global Security Studies@journalofgss.bsky.social · 4w ago

Why do armed groups use extreme forms of violence? Read this #JOGSS article on how leadership transitions can shape the strategic use of extreme and costly violence, including beheadings, by jihadist organisations. 🔗 doi.org/10.1093/jogs...

On the left is the cover of The Journal of Global Security Studies. Along the bottom, the journal’s homepage, https://academic.oup.com/jogss, and Bluesky handle, @journalofgss.bsky.social, appear in white text on a navy-blue background. The main image depicts a handgun firing with a bright flash in a dark setting. It is overlaid with the article title and authors’ names: “Leadership succession and jihadist beheadings,” by Mark Berlin, Ilayda B. Önder, and Joshua Fawcett Weiner.

Why do armed groups use extreme forms of violence? Excited to share this new open access article! Analyzing beheading attacks conducted by jihadist groups, we examine the impact of leadership succession, targeting, and tenure on organizational tactics academic.oup.com/jogss/articl...

Leadership succession and jihadist beheadings

Abstract. Why do armed groups use extreme forms of violence? Existing research argues that ideological beliefs, organizational alliances, and efforts to ge

academic.oup.com

Very happy to note my new article with the brilliant Jayme Schlesinger at @journalofgss.bsky.social. We examine how threats and follow-through (and more importantly lack thereof) by intervening states in asymmetric conflicts influences attacks by rebel groups.

Bigger Costs Than Audience Costs? Studying the Dynamics of Audience Costs Theory in Asymmetric Conflicts

Abstract. Audience costs theory suggests that leaders face “costs” in terms of a loss public support when failing to follow through on publicly made threat

academic.oup.com

As long as Galtung's triangle continues to be a standard in peace studies 101 classes, I think we need to also include its critiques and extensions. In my argument, the framework that so usefully makes systemic harm visible to new learners also makes responsibility and justice invisible.

Journal of Global Security Studies@journalofgss.bsky.social · 3mo ago

What if "structural violence" isn’t always as faceless as we assume? @juliehawke.bsky.social's concept of institutional violence challenges Galtung’s classic triad of direct, cultural and structural violence by asking us to look more closely at attribution. 🔗 doi.org/10.1093/jogs...

On the left is the cover of The Journal of Global Security Studies. Along the bottom, the journal’s homepage, https://academic.oup.com/jogss, and Bluesky handle, @journalofgss.bsky.social, appear in white text on a navy-blue background. The main image depicts a stack of books, a world map, and a tea glass, and is overlaid with the article title and author’s name: “Institutional Violence: A Missing Link in Peace Studies,” by Julie A. Hawke.

Thank you to everyone who joined us at our joint reception last Sunday. We hope you enjoyed the event and reconnecting with colleagues. It was also a pleasure to share merchandise with our reviewers and authors as a small token of appreciation. Thanks for being part of it. Hope to see you again.

BildBildBildBild