I had a blast contributing to this year's edition of the Summer School on Legal Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence, at the University of Lisbon School of Law, by offering the "Methods of Legal Interpretation" session! About SS'26 LR&AI 👇 lisbonpubliclaw.pt/en/eventos/s...

Great experience last week at the 32nd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR 2026), held at Kadir Has University in Istanbul!

Next Monday & Tuesday I'll be convening Special Workshop 61 - "Contemporary Challenges to Authority" at the 32nd World Congress of the Int'l Association for the Philosophy of Law & Social Philosophy (IVR 2026) in Istanbul. Here's everything regarding the who, what, and when 👇

Season 1 of #HAPL is a wrap! 12 episodes, 12 heavily accented conversations in legal theory & philosophy with G Postema, M Segatti, D Farinhos, G Tuzet, M Jovanović, A Waltermann, P Moniz Lopes, M Carpentier, V Rodriguez-Blanco, I Skoczeń, F Esposito & F Poggi All episodes👇

Ep. #12 of Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law Podcast is here - and now also on YouTube! We delve with Francesca Poggi (University of Milan) into the topic of legal interpretation and the conversational model Listen 👇 open.spotify.com/episode/4rs1... Watch 👇 youtu.be/Y7A2QOmXnHs?...

Episode 12 - Legal Interpretation and the Conversational Model (ft. Francesca Poggi)

open.spotify.com

Thrilled to share that I am organising a workshop at the IVR 2026 on one pressing question: what does authority in law mean in a world that looks nothing like the one our traditional frameworks were built for? 🗓️Call for Abstracts Deadline: 1 June 2026 All info 👉 ivr2026istanbul.org/special-work...

Are our theories of authority enough to account for cases of global practical authority, such as the WADA? M Jovanovic & I explore this question in our contribution to Revista Problema’s Discussion section: “The Nature of Practical Authority" 👉 doi.org/10.22201/iij...

Now published: 'Bernard Williams on Law and Jurisprudence' The first collection of essays on Bernard Williams' moral and political philosophy to shed light on the nature of law ➡️ https://bit.ly/4bw8dWD #LegalPhilosophy

A second (and last, I promise!) paper of mine is published this week, as part of a special issue of Revus edited by the great @jrabanos.bsky.social and @bojanspaic.bsky.social. I have tried to keep the Latin to an absolute minimum. journals.openedition.org/revus/11964

Quid jus or quid juris?

Law – nobody knows what it isGustave Flaubert This article will defend a seemingly simple claim: what law is (quid jus) and what the law is in a given jurisdiction (quid juris) are two separate que...

journals.openedition.org

"Bernard Williams on Law and Jurisprudence: From Agency and Responsibility to Methodology", co-edited with Daniel Murata & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, is finally published! (@hartpublishing.bsky.social, Law & Practical Reason series) All the information about the volume and contents, here👇

Ep. #11 of Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law Podcast is here! We delve with Fabrizio Esposito (NOVA University Lisbon) into the topic of foundations of economic analysis of law Listen to it here 👇 creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/...

I had the pleasure of writing a short review for @jotwell.bsky.social ! You can find Poggi & Ferraro's paper here 👉 t.co/CzzZBlUQa6 You can the review here 👇

Jotwell@jotwell.bsky.social · 10mo ago

Jotwell Jurisprudence: Julieta Rabanos, The Veil of Legislative Intent, JOTWELL (Nov. 21, 2025) (reviewing Francesca Poggi & Francesco Ferraro From the Ideal Legislator to the Competent Speaker: Uncovering the Deception in Legislative Intent, 15 Juris. 464 (2024)), juris.jotwell.com/the-veil-of-....

Jotwell Jurisprudence: Julieta Rabanos, The Veil of Legislative Intent, JOTWELL (Nov. 21, 2025) (reviewing Francesca Poggi & Francesco Ferraro From the Ideal Legislator to the Competent Speaker: Uncovering the Deception in Legislative Intent, 15 Juris. 464 (2024)), juris.jotwell.com/the-veil-of-....

Ha habido un largo camino entre esa muy joven yo que miró a la autoridad y preguntó: ¿por qué? Un camino que todavía sigo recorriendo (y aprendiendo) paso a paso... o, en nuestro ámbito, obra a obra. Estoy feliz, y muy (muy) agradecida, de ver finalmente publicado este libro.

In recent decades, authority has mainly been treated as a reason-based concept within legal philosophy, understood through practical reasoning Here, I analyse this choice & its theoretical & practical consequences - and why we may want to reconsider it 👇 dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781...

As @bojanspaic.bsky.social has said, in legal theory one lives on the "highly recommended" of the Legal Theory Blog. Thanks @lsolum.bsky.social !

Lawrence Solum@lsolum.bsky.social · 12mo ago

Spaic & Rabanos on Schauer on Free Speech, buff.ly/PzZCAIq - Bojan Spaic (University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law) & Julieta A. Rabanos (University of Girona) have posted Schauer on Free Speech: A Lifelong Enquiry on SSRN.

Spaic & Rabanos on Schauer on Free Speech, buff.ly/PzZCAIq - Bojan Spaic (University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law) & Julieta A. Rabanos (University of Girona) have posted Schauer on Free Speech: A Lifelong Enquiry on SSRN.

The fabulous @jrabanos.bsky.social and @BojanSpaic discussed experimental jurisprudence with me in their awesome podcast! If you want to know why experimental jurisprudence is not like theoretical physics, or what does lying and reasonableness have in common, check it out!

Julieta Rabanos@jrabanos.bsky.social · 12mo ago

Ep. #10 of Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law Podcast is here! In this episode, we delve with Iza Skoczeń (@izaskoczen.bsky.social - Jagiellonian Centre for Law, Language and Philosophy) into the topic of experimental jurisprudence. Listen to it here 👇 creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/...

Ep. #10 of Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law Podcast is here! In this episode, we delve with Iza Skoczeń (@izaskoczen.bsky.social - Jagiellonian Centre for Law, Language and Philosophy) into the topic of experimental jurisprudence. Listen to it here 👇 creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/...

Thrilled to be participating, this Monday and Tuesday in Freiburg, in the upcoming edition of the Annual Workshop on the Vienna School of Jurisprudence and the Pure Theory of Law, organised by the Hans Kelsen Werke - Research Group! Here the full programme 👇

Finally here!

Julieta Rabanos@jrabanos.bsky.social · last yr.

If law is an artefact, can coercion be considered as something necessary for its existence and functioning? Here, I examine why law may necessarily depend on coercion both to exist and to fulfil its functions - even in law-abiding & puzzled societies. 👇 link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...

Last week gifted me some magnificent moments, born at the intersection of my academic job and four great life pleasures: 1. Cat petting 2. Seeing friends & discussing their ideas (this time, @amwaltermann.com's) 3. Applied fantasy and sci-fi 4. Bizarre-fabulous new & old places

FOL Blog had his first international guest post - and what a guest! Triantafyllos Gkouvas opened here with the first part of a triptych on the notion on moral impact, where he suggests a particular view on the normative impact of non-physical events Read it here 👇 fol.ius.bg.ac.rs/2025/06/24/t...

The Foundations of Law (FOL) Blog has just launched! FOL Blog is dedicated to disseminating research outputs of EU Project ALF (alf.ius.bg.ac.rs) & also features content produced by invited guests and experts from diverse fields related to legal theory & philosophy. 👉 fol.ius.bg.ac.rs

Thrilled to be participating in the VIII Lisbon Annual Meeting on Legal Theory on "Logic, Norms, and Legal Decisions", among a rooster of fantastic speakers and discussants. If you are free on 27 June, join us! 👇

Ep. #9 of Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law Podcast is here! In this episode, we delve with Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (Surrey Centre for Law & Philosophy - U. Surrey) into the topic of responsibility for negligence in ethics and law. Listen to it here 👇 creators.spotify.com/pod/show/hap...

If law is an artefact, can coercion be considered as something necessary for its existence and functioning? Here, I examine why law may necessarily depend on coercion both to exist and to fulfil its functions - even in law-abiding & puzzled societies. 👇 link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...

Can AI be a ‘legal author’? @bojanspaic.bsky.social and I had a blast exploring this seemly unattended question in contemporary debate (ft. authority, interpretation, intention, GenAI, creation & generation, Monty Python, Star Trek, S Lem, R Barthes, cats & more) 👇 doi.org/10.1007/s109...

We had a great workshop today on all things constitutional interpretation. A thousand thanks to @jrabanos.bsky.social @sebreyes.bsky.social @amwaltermann.com Pedro Moniz Lopes and Jorge Silva Sampaio for brilliant papers and stimulating discussions.

This Monday, in Toulouse, I am organizing a workshop on the philosophy of constitutional interpretation, with a star-studded lineup. Info and Zoom link here: imh.ut-capitole.fr/accueil/acti... @jrabanos.bsky.social @sebreyes.bsky.social @amwaltermann.com