J. Sam Drolet

@jsamdrolet.bsky.social

Personal account. He/him/his.

Thinking further on this, I think one aspect of the generational divide on I/P is that at least in the US, people my age and younger were taught a much more accurate version of US history in school than previous generations got. We've had to wrestle with that in a way that older people didn't.

J. Sam Drolet@jsamdrolet.bsky.social · 12h ago

It's obviously primarily a proxy for guilt (or sublimation thereof) from existing in a successful settler-colonial state by Americans who don't have any particular personal connection to Israel, on both sides.

I like this conception of the origin of ancient Israel as a melding of people from several different origins not just because it makes good sense of both the archaeological and literary data (although it does), but because it provides a model of a pluralistic and relatively democratic society.

J. Sam Drolet@jsamdrolet.bsky.social · 4d ago

This all makes a ton of sense to me, and I basically buy it. Importantly, it explains the rise of Israel (and Judah) as a society of people with many different origins converging on the highlands of inland Palestine in the early Iron Age.

I read a couple of papers tonight that really crystallized for me an interpretation of the Exodus tradition and the origins of ancient Israel that makes actual sense and fits with the archaeological evidence (though I'm not sure I necessarily buy it entirely).

This is a good thread describing the context for Jesus and his teachings as preserved in the Gospels. (Which may or may not reflect the teachings of the historical Jesus, of course, but *someone* in that context was advocating these things.)

Jessica Price@delafina777.bsky.social · 5d ago

Jesus was grappling with the same problem a lot of first-century Jewish thinkers (including the Pharisees/Tannaim, the Essenes, the Sadducees) were struggling with, which was how to survive the Roman occupation. They arrived at different solutions.

A lot of Discourse around the NYC Groceries proposal has been on a very abstract level, so I decided to download the actual operator RFP and read through it to see what Mamdani is actually proposing to do. You can download it here by clicking the "Download" button. edc.nyc/nyc-grocerie...

N.Y.C. Groceries Operator(s) RFP

New York City Economic Development Corporation (“NYCEDC”), in collaboration with the City of New York (the “City”), is releasing a Request for

edc.nyc

Yeah, this is my take on the latest Stancil Discourse too. In an important way the two sides are just talking past each other and addressing different audiences. (Note that this was also my take on Nolan/Wilson Odyssey Discourse. Has Stancil weighed in on that one yet?)

Hemry, Local Bartender@bartenderhemry.bsky.social · last wk.

Without addressing the hate mob phenomenon which is self-evidently bad I think we're also running into a philosophical difference where one side is like "does this action solve this problem" and the other is like "is this action morally good"

There are a *lot* of ancient writings of various kinds that survive only as quotes in works arguing against them. The extent to which we can reconstruct their arguments from the quotes varies but it's very clear that the range of opinions on lots of things was quite broad.

Ste Jormur@stejormur.bsky.social · last wk.

I read Tim Whitmarsh's "Atheism in the Ancient World", which makes the point that there is virtually no surviving ancient atheist writing... but there is a large pile of anti-atheist argument and drama and laws, and they had to be responding to *someone*

I will reiterate: Christians in the West evangelize in public for the same reason men catcall. Neither is trying to persuade you; both are reminding you that the public sphere belongs to them and you exist in it at their sufferance.

No one is reading the London Review of Books to decide whether or not to go see a Christopher Nolan movie. Both Nolan and Wilson are just doing their thing and addressing very different audiences in different ways. They're both making tons of money from this (which is great!) and will be fine.

All Chinese claims on Taiwan date to the 1662 invasion by renegade warlord and pirate Koxinga, a partisan of the so-called "Southern Ming" false dynasty rather than the legitimate Qing. The island should therefore be returned to its rightful rulers, the Dutch, who liberated it from the Papists.