Viola Tricolor

@kaffeehaus.bsky.social

Been screen reader and keyboard shortcut testing some of our platforms today and let me tell you listening to a screen reader is utterly exhausting and also you really need to write decent alt text.

It was always strange to call the genocide in Gaza a war, but it's even more bizarre when there is a ceasefire and Israel has killed 1200 Palestinians since then. Even if the Guardian doesn't want to use the term genocide "war" doesn't capture one sided slaughter of civilians

Bild

In my experience (and that limits a lot here), most authors don't have much say on the covers, they are presented with several options but they aren't even the only ones to choose as there are others within the publisher who have a say and whose words have more weight than the author's. So ...

Paul Cooper@paulmmcooper.com · 13h ago

Not sure how to feel about this historian of Indonesia using a very visibly AI image on the cover of his upcoming book. If he's telling the truth then he's been conned by this "Indonesian artist". And if not...

The cover of Herald van der Linde's upcoming book Srivijaya. It features an AI image of Borobudur and a volcano, with the ocean incorrectly placed right behind it.

It's also (charitably) an example of how difficult it is to keep this stuff out of your work. It's not just enough to reject the technology yourself - you have to rigorously inspect every supplier you use, every freelance artist, every image or piece of stock footage. It's exhausting

It's an example of how just one drop of AI in your work brings the whole thing into question. If you're happy using it on your cover, did you use AI to write this? Research it? Can I trust that your primary source quotes are real?

'You'll choke too' - an aerial embroidery landscape inspired by all the wildfires happening right now... I'm upset every time I smell smoke outside and somehow we have people starting them maliciously too! But we all breathe the same air so they'll choke too (1/2 - see thread for close-ups)

An embroidery hoop containing a sewn landscape from above. It shows a forest on the right, a line of fire and charred ground with smoke on the left. The smoke is felted wool.

There is an interesting question in this piece full of interesting thoughts: How much influence does fact-checking have, how common is it? The instances in which I've fact-checked a text were AFTER the book was acquired, i.e. when it was too late. The book got published, discreetely altered so ...

Rachel Malik@rachelmalik.bsky.social · 2d ago

‘The irony is that thousands of academics are losing their jobs right now, for reasons that are entirely financial, without anything to do with knowledge or Truth, though will do incalculable damage to the overall social system on which knowledge depends’

'rare books experts are increasingly worried that these artefacts may be under threat of destruction by generative AI companies seeking to feed their ravenous technology with new texts.' First they came for your monograph, then for rare books. Where next: wholesale destruction of archives?

‘More than just objects’: Australian booksellers raise alarm over ‘horrific’ destruction of rare titles to feed AI

Secondhand booksellers believe they may have been caught up in the AI supply chain that sees old books scanned then destroyed

theguardian.com

💯 So much this 👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽 Can I recommend/plug “Between Two Rivers” by @moudhy.bsky.social to really highlight this point — we humans, connecting to humans in our deep past, who in turn were also connecting to humans in their deep past — through storytelling. The machines can *never* do this.

Dr. Sarah Parcak @indyfromspace.bsky.social · 4mo ago

I think one of the reasons generative AI is so deeply grating is that storytelling was an adaptive trait that made (and makes) us human. I'm writing my communication book chapter now and this struck me- not in a present sense but in a deep time sense.

There is a funny effect of those two decades in which Great Britain and France didn't see eye to eye: Artists had to forego their continental Grand Tour and stay on their island! (Weren't there any exceptions?) THOMAS ROWLANDSON & HENRY MERKE An Artist Travelling in Wales, 1799

I insert the description of the MET-homepage because that is way better than I could do it: "In this image, a tall, thin, figure–possibly intended for Wigstead–balances on a small pony. Man and beast are laden with artistic paraphernalia, all inadequately shielded from the downpour. A rustic family watches in amazement; for them the artist presents a much more interesting spectacle than the scenery."