Kevin Jon Heller 🇺🇸🇩🇰

@kevinjonheller.bsky.social

Professor of International Law & Security, University of Copenhagen, Centre for Military Studies. Academic Member, Doughty Street Chambers (UK). Arsenal, Bears, Magpies, All Blacks.

The Bureau apparently regrets putting on paper that the ASP will decide for itself whether the Prosecutor engaged in misconduct, a vote the Bureau will likely lose. So now FIDH is leading efforts to mislead states and the public about the rules to make it easier for the Bureau to backtrack.

Kevin Jon Heller 🇺🇸🇩🇰@kevinjonheller.bsky.social · last mo.

This "Q&A" gets the voting wrong. As I've explained, the new RPE require the ASP to decide for itself whether the Prosecutor engaged in misconduct. A removal vote happens only if they find serious misconduct by a 2/3 vote of states present and voting. opiniojuris.org/2026/06/18/t...

This article gets the voting wrong. The ASP must decide for itself whether the Prosecutor engaged in serious misconduct, a vote requiring 2/3 of states parties present & voting to vote yes. The ASP is not bound by the Bureau's political determination. See RPE 29, adopted by consensus last December.

Stephanie van den Berg@svdberg.bsky.social · last mo.

ICC bureau says Khan should be fired for inappropriate sexual relationship - www.reuters.com/world/icc-bu...

The Bureau did not investigate. The diplomats voted as they were instructed to do so by the governments they represent --- politics, not law. The only investigation was conducted by OIOS and, as the Panel of Judges repeatedly noted, OIOS did not make findings of fact on the allegations.

Post nicht verfügbar.

Note to readers: the ICC spokesperson not denying applications for arrest warrants have been filed means nothing. The Court would not acknowledge that applications had been filed. It would not acknowledge that applications has not been filed. End of story. There are no tea leaves here.

Rima I Anabtawi@rimaanabtawi.bsky.social · 3mo ago

"ICC spokesperson Oriane Maillet said in a note to journalists that ... the court “denies the issuance of new arrest warrants in the situation in the state of Palestine” "Her statement did not deny that they* were seeking new warrants" [which is what Haaretz reported]

Since September 2025, the U.S. military has been carrying out a campaign of premeditated, targeted killings against *civilians*—the boat bombings. So senior U.S. military officers and DoD officials claiming they care about CIVCAS rings a tad hollow.

This is an interesting and important post, but it misrepresents the #ICC's territorial jurisdiction. The authors claim the PTC held in Bangladesh/Myanmar "that jurisdiction attaches where at least one element of a crime, or its effects, occurs on state party territory." But that isn't correct.

Just Security@justsecurity.org · 3mo ago

International criminal law has been silent on transnational repression, but the tools to disrupt this pattern of impunity may already be available, write Brandon Silver and Kate McInnes. Their recommendations on how to address this gap, here: #TNR #Iran #Accountability