Bryan Based International Order 🇨🇦

@bryanpeeler.bsky.social

International relations/law UManitoba Political Science https://umanitoba.ca/arts/bryan-peeler Bryan Based International Order: https://substack.com/@bryanpeeler Author of The Persistence of Reciprocity in IHL: https://rb.gy/p39ckt

Iran and Oman have reportedly agreed that all ships transiting Hormuz have to go through an Iran-controlled corridor, and are finalizing tolls of 3, 5, or 7%. This would close off the path outside Iranian waters the US encouraged ships to use during the MOU, then started bombing again to keep open.

Proposed Hormuz deal would give Iran control of inbound traffic, sources say

A proposed deal between Iran and Oman would give Tehran control over ships entering the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz, a senior Iranian source and two regional officials told Reuters, in one of th...

reuters.com

I spoke w/ @kayliwewe.bsky.social for @newlinesmag.bsky.social about the search for a new ICC prosecutor. States Parties & candidates will likely face intense US pressure (re Netanyahu & Gallant warrants, Palestine investigation, & shielding US officials). To succumb would be a catastrophic mistake.

New Lines Magazine@newlinesmag.bsky.social · yesterday

NEW: The ICC is searching for a new chief prosecutor at a defining moment. As @kayliwewe.bsky.social writes in @newlinesmag.bsky.social, the new leader will inherit major cases, political pressure and questions over whether the court can regain trust. newlinesmag.com/spotlight/th...

Direct connection between reporting on US plans for military strikes in Latin American countries & Rubio’s attack on the ICC: - Many countries in the region are ICC States Parties - The ICC has jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide perpetrated on State Party territory

BildBildBildBild

It may not be surprising, but it's nevertheless sad to see a Canadian newspaper trumpet Washington's call to demolish the #ICC, and siding with impunity for Putin, Netanyahu, and the Taliban. This is now part of the right's firmament, along with anti-trans politics and Residential School denialism.

Bild

This refers to the executive branch position that prior congressional authorization is only required for hostilities amounting to "war" in the "constitutional sense" due to nature, scope, & duration. Neither Congress nor courts have endorsed this view. And Congress rejected it in the 1973 WPR.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 2d ago

Sen. Rand Paul: "I've had the debate with this administration ... they told me this isn't a war. I said, why isn't it a war? They said, 'Well, a constitutional war has to have significant casualties' ... initiation or declaration of war is *before* the casualties."