Kate Klonick

@klonick.bsky.social

Law professor & journalist looking at tech geopolitics, free expression, internet law, online governance, & AI. Senior Editor at Lawfare. https://klonick.substack.com/ www.kateklonick.com

I never feel so old as when my car sails over the Whitestone bridge seamlessly swiping me into NYC I still have the memory of slowing into toll booth queues, aimless staring at trees, maneuvering lines, searching for coins & the ticket to pay There’s no trace of it now & I feel gaslit by Route 678

I just took an outdoor shower. It is 75 and sunny with a light glorious breeze. My dad and I dug a bushel of littleneck clams this morning. And I am going to sit on the back deck for an hour with a can of Narragansett and read Moby Dick, which I found at the dump when I was dropping off trash.

Bild

Was Hines v Stamos Cheryl Hines suing John Stamos over the long-awaited Full House/Curb Your Enthusiasm crossover? Nope, it was an attempt to suppress academic research into the organized manipulation of online platforms. After three years we finally won. But at great cost.

Kate Starbird@katestarbird.bsky.social · last mo.

Two years ago, my colleagues and I were sued by Stephen Miller's America First Legal. The Hines v Stamos case — built atop a number of false allegations — was a central element of the "censorship industrial complex" myth. Today, that case was dismissed (by a Trump judge in LA). We won.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
JILL HINES ET AL — CASE NO. 3:23-CV-00571
VERSUS — JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY
ALEX STAMOS ET AL — MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY
MEMORANDUM RULING
Before the Court is a Renewed Joint Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter and Personal Jurisdiction [Doc. No. 191] filed by Defendants, Alex Stamos, Renée DiResta, the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, the Leland Stanford Junior University, Kate Starbird, Graphika, Camille François, the Atlantic Council, and Graham Brookie (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiffs, Jill Hines ("Hines") and Jim Hoft ("Hoft") (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed an Opposition [Doc. No. 207]. Defendants then filed a Reply [Doc. No. 209].
For the reasons set forth, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

I adore @doctorow.pluralistic.net, and though we don't always agree on the descriptive realities of a situation or policies, you never walk away from a conversation (or podcast!!) with him without challenging your priors and thinking differently about the world. Have a listen!

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org · last mo.

On Lawfare Daily, @klonick.bsky.social and @alanrozenshtein.com were joined by @doctorow.pluralistic.net to discuss his new book “The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI," what the "reverse centaur" is and how it maps onto a broader culture. youtu.be/T1KIwaYRs1g