Debian Linux turned 33 today. Happy birthday Debian Linux. All Debian code names based on the characters of the Toy Story franchise to refer to its releases. www.debian.org
Debian -- The Universal Operating System
debian.org
J. W. Knott
@knittergamer.bsky.social
Reading audio books while I knit; knitting during MMO & Tabletop RPG’ing; long term decluttering project participant; Oma to 3 cats; komenco lerni Esperanto; military spouse, mom of 2, finding my own voice again. She/her. No Bitcoin/Crypto crap.
Debian Linux turned 33 today. Happy birthday Debian Linux. All Debian code names based on the characters of the Toy Story franchise to refer to its releases. www.debian.org
Debian -- The Universal Operating System
debian.org
And let’s be clear—this information is out there because we took the Trump administration to court. This fall, we can elect a Congress that will follow the Constitution’s call to be a check on a lawless President.
Another day, another impeachable offense: The White House ordered federal agencies to block resources to Colorado because it had punished an election denier. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/14/u...
I'm curious about those articles. I'm curious about how they were presented. Do you have links you could provide, or keywords?
There was at least one other in the same time period, but only two, maybe three, articles were written about it.
The attention called to it felt disproportionate. I dunno if that's the reality, but I can't remember seeing any major news about a professor possibly having plagiarized; not this loud anyways.
Wasn't there some rich guy (who posted very long screeds) whose wife was caught plagiarizing, snd nothing happened to her?
Anyway. That man was driven to suicide & shouldn’t have been. Because he wasn’t extended the same grace as his colleagues demonstrably would have been.
When a Black person fails it satisfies the societal preconceived notion that allowing Blackfolk to exist in shared space at all is an act of charity they should have been too grateful for to exhibit poor judgment or make mistakes in the first place. It justifies your collective beliefs about us all.
I’m not trying to hear about plagiarism from people who can’t get anything done without AI. You’re disqualified on this one. That plagiarism is bad is supposed to be a settled social belief. AI use muddies the whole thing.
The only conversation worth having is how Black people are overpoliced & over-punished & held to different standards in all aspects of life. That there is an outrage when Black people transgress that isn’t there when their non-Black counterparts do.
Abolishing ICE is now the official position of the Democratic Party
Here are things that happened at the DNC today: 1) Resolution calling to abolish ICE unanimously adopted 2) Brand-new early state calendar that reflects the full diversity of the Democratic base 3) Rejection of insider efforts to ban RCV from being used in presidential primaries Great results here
This 👇 "We're putting the world on notice that the Ebola crisis is real. And we've got to get real. This is now everybody's problem. It is doubling every twenty days. ... This is going to keep on growing and we need the world to wake up and respond."
Just chaired meeting of global humanitarian leadership on the #Ebola epidemic, with @drtedros.who.int. This crisis is real, and growing. Our teams are doing courageous, vital work on the frontlines. But let me be clear: this is not enough. We need the world to wake up and show up.
Prices Outrun Wages Again #ABlueView🧵 "Government data released this week showed that consumer prices rose 3.4% in July from a year earlier, outpacing a 3.2% increase in hourly earnings over the same period. That means that, for the 4th month in a row, Americans’ real wages... actually fell." 1/3
Reminds me of when mainstream media talking heads say things like “Everybody is saying.” or “Everybody knows.” something you’ve never heard out of the mouth of anybody in real life. Only in the news. What a narrow world they exist in, yet they think it represents reality for most people.
Biased editors and their elite owners of "the media can't even entertain the idea that they decide what stories to focus on. why won't this story go away? in reality, because it speaks to the insecurities, pathologies, & prejudices of media middle management. that's it" bsky.app/profile/polp...
This is the coverage of Arday **just in the Telegraph** in the UK. This is only the first four pages of results, just in one outlet.
Media elite pretending no bias by obviously biased old men editors and their mediocre nepo baby pervert billionaires Angry at LGBTQ+, woke MeToo encouraging slightly more responsibility, uppity minorities not knowing their place, working class getting paid a little bit more, climate change activism
"And which is more serious: 1) A silly campus protest 2) Someone said a mean thing Leftishly 3) Armed agents of the state murdering people 4) A political party using the state to silence dissent. (3) and (4) are very obviously a much bigger deal than (1) or (2), not that you can tell from the NYT"
they're trying to rewrite history.
Woke was always rebellious. It was about the mouse speaking up to the cat, and the cat was incensed that the natural order of things might change.
To the media and commentary elite, the great sin of these various social movements during Trump 1 was that they demanded respect & decent treatment from their betters, when they are instead supposed to politely and quietly beg for small amounts should the high and mighty feel charitable about it.
these fools should be on their knees thanking god for "woke," it monetized whining when they had nothing else to say
indeed you could say that "wokeness" in the pundit imagination was an incredible financial and reputational gift to a set of mediocre intellectuals & writers who otherwise would have struggled to find anything to sell the public other than eg their musings about emily ratajkowski's breasts
the strongest argument for the idea that "woke 1" wasn't some kind of inquisition is that all throughout you could get fame and money just by publishing attacks on it. The Coddling of the American Mind, the harper's letter, TCW and McWhorter- there was never an unprofitable time for the anti-woke
Normally I just appreciatively read @jamellebouie.net 's columns-sharable video content just isn't my bag. But this is a very, very, very trenchant piece of commentary that captures a lot of how I increasingly understand the disjunction between the commentary environment and on-the-ground politics.
"typical Harper's letter signatory's Twitter *still* 80% complaints about the "woke left" even in midst of greatest government crack-down on free speech in 60 years." "media/political elite addiction to Twitter is shaping their views, which in turn shape millions of people. a total reality-warper."
You think it's bad here?
NYT editors (and nepo baby owner) put "Claudine Gay" in "top 5 featured on the New York Times homepage Dec 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 22, 25" While they put Trump calling for Constitution's "termination" on page 15 and chief of staff "tyrant" warning on 12 Chris Rufo openly bragged about it:
Chris Rufo "a total product of right-wing affirmative action and you literally would never have heard of him if he was a liberal" bsky.app/profile/chri... NYT front page coverage all the time! By powerful, mediocre editors who push "meritocracy" narrative yet hired each other with legacy privilege
Actually, one more - I feel like I should say this directly, so here goes. In the 90s and 00s, the groups I remember pursuing this strategy (hyperpublicize mugshots, Black crime statistics, etc) were Stormfront, the Klan, etc. Now it's the New York Times and the Telegraph. That is the story here.
"hmm maybe this whole Arday affair shows that we need to have a Serious Conversation about whether Woke 1.0 overreached in manner X, Y, of Z" motherfucker you are generally in Fascism 487.0, as is this particular affair you're talking about. worry about *that*. /Final
Philosophers often bring up the "principle of charity": a willingness to assume good faith in an interlocutor and treat them accordingly. It's good to do in many circumstances. But it is worth formulating a principle of not being a fucking mark. If not during the rise of fascism, then when? 12/