Katie Riley

@ktriley.bsky.social

Data and visual journalist. Worked: The Observer, WSJ, FT, Atlantic. Midwesterner, Londoner, sleepy, has actually looked at the data. Immigrant. [Email me: kteriley@gmail.com]

It’s not the most important point by any means, but we should stop calling it “earned settlement”. Settlement has always been earned, and using the HO’s misleading language is just doing their PR for them. I’m going to start calling it “delayed settlement” instead. That’s actually what it is.

Luke Piper@lukepiper.bsky.social · 6d ago

'If the Home Secretary knows earned settlement harms care workers, why is it acceptable for everyone else?' nicely put @josephinewy.bsky.social

What all of the “is Abdul too harsh blah blah blah” people don’t get is that the most underserved American constituency is those of us who are just absolute dyed in the woool, certified haters. And Abdul is one of us 🤝

#StupidSuez@diplomatofnight.com · 6d ago

Abdul: You see JD Vance now, he's sprinting as hard backwards as he can from this terrible, disastrous war in Iran. You should have spoken up, but you never will because, of course, you are a coward who has decided that whatever Donald Trump says should go.

With Mississippi's U.S. Senate race effectively tied, know this: About 70,000 people in Mississippi are blocked from voting because of felony convictions. *Two-thirds* of them are Black—a huge overrepresentation in a state where Black people make up less than 40% of the overall population.

For real, though, Abdul read James Matthews to absolute filth because only two groups of people in the States have even heard of Sky News, let alone ever watched it: 1. Journalists working in the New York bureaus of U.K. newspapers 2. Diplomats staying in $900/night hotel rooms in Washington, DC

Something else that’s not being discussed yet because very few journalists actually understand the system enough to cover it properly: They’re closing the Long Residence (i.e. 10-Year) Route, which let you combine your time on different types of visas together. Again, absolutely diabolical stuff.

Something I haven’t seen discussed explicitly so far is that the 20- and 30-year routes seem *intentionally designed* to do exactly this – deprive the U.K.-born children of refugees British citizenship. Not only is this cruel, it’s directly in violation of a UNHCR mandate to reduce statelessness.

Sinan Kose@thesinankose.bsky.social · last wk.

Very hard not to reflect upon the fact that if this was the case when my parents came to the UK that they maybe have only just got settlement about 11 years ago when I was 21 and that I wouldn't be entitled to British citizenship. Kind of insane to think that *Thatcher* was less cruel than this.

"A Home Office spokesperson told The i Paper: “This Government has announced reforms that mean settlement must be earned and not automatic." hey @theipaper.com, there IS no automatic settlement. can you be the first news site to do its job and point this out? ask ukgov why they keep lying about it?

Sir Almaviva@ilcontealmaviva.bsky.social · 2w ago

A few stories about people who will be impacted by the ILR changes. The changes will accomplish nothing except inflicting misery and suffering on people, which at this point I must assume is their only purpose.

Hey Sean! In the past 13 years, I’ve earned two degrees in this country, paid for the NHS surcharge x6, paid for visa fees x6, paid my taxes, and consistently been a good student, a good neighbour and a good employee. I *still* don’t have ILR. What about that sounds automatic to you?

Sean Woodcock MP@seanlwoodcock.bsky.social · last wk.

The right to live in the UK forever will no longer be granted to migrants almost automatically after 5 years. Instead, it will be earned, under the new earned settlement model set out before Parliament today. www.gov.uk/government/n...

a little browsing on skilledworkersUK subreddit tells you that people's lives are upended for no reason. it's hard to imagine anyone who's not limited by family or relationships is not gonna leave. "I'm going home, so I guess the reform voters won".

Relevant to today's conversation about AI's inherent sexism, here's an email from cognitive psychologist and early AI theorist Roger Schank, arguing to Epstein that women can't be truly intelligent, because they care too much about what other people think.

To: Jeffrey epstein[jeevacation©gmail.com]
From: roger schank
Sent: Mon 1/4/2010 12:15:13 PM
Subject: there is a simpler explanation about women and intelligence
intelligence comes about in part from real focus (goal-directed
(this is why you have the absent minded professor caricature)
it is a rare woman who is not first and foremost focussed on what
thinking and feeling about her
hard to be brilliant if you are worrying if you look fat or why
hates you or why you dont own a kelly bag
roger schank
http://www.rogerschank.com/

As a UK resident who has paid for two degrees, five visas, and more than 10 years of the NHS surcharge since I moved here at 19, this is infuriating. As a journalist, it's alarming that the Home Sec clearly does not understand the system she says needs to be reformed. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

Shabana Mahmood defends immigration reforms amid Labour opposition

Around 40 Labour MPs have raised concerns about the impact of the government's proposals.

bbc.co.uk