Larry Norden

@larrynorden.bsky.social

Rumors about “rigged elections" are now a fixture of U.S. elections, leading to diminished trust in election results & democracy (broadly). These rumors can sometimes be hard to debunk, esp. in their early stages. Our UW team has identified the 6 common ways that election integrity rumors mislead:

Infographic titled "Six Ways 'Rigged Election' Rumors Mislead." A two-column table pairs six labeled categories with descriptions. The first three categories are:

No Evidence: The rumor is entirely unsubstantiated. There's no evidence to support the rumor.

Fake/False Evidence: The rumor is based on fake or synthetic evidence (e.g. AI-generated content), manipulated evidence, or false witness testimony.

Misinterpreted Evidence: This rumor is based upon real evidence that has been misinterpreted or intentionally mischaracterized to create a false impression.

A black banner then introduces the final three categories: "Real Evidence, Real Voting Issue, False Narrative."

Exaggerated Impact: The rumor centers on a real issue with voting but falsely insinuates or exaggerates impact on election results.

Ignored Remedies: The rumor centers on a real issue with voting but ignores and/or obscures the remedies that would address this problem

False Blame: The rumor centers on a real issue with voting but either falsely attributes intent for an accidental issue or places blame on an innocent party.

Source: UW Center for an Informed Public, September 2026.

@brennancenter.org tested some of the most popular AI models to learn how they can be exploited to peddle false election narratives in this year's midterms. @larrynorden.bsky.social and David Evan Harris on how AI companies, lawmakers, and civil society can ensure free and fair elections this fall:

The Second AI Election: Testing the Safeguards Before November

Tests of six popular AI models show how easily their election safeguards can be bypassed, and what companies, lawmakers, and civil society should be before November.

justsecurity.org

Brennan Center published a nice article about the dual strategy of disputing established polls and putting out low-quality or biased polls to muddy the waters on leading candidates. One worry is how this might mesh with GOP efforts to contest election results if/when they lose.

Simon Rosenberg@simonwdc.bsky.social · last wk.

In the past six days six right-aligned pollsters have begun "flooding the zone," releasing eighteen polls in eleven battleground Senate races. While they've done this before the pace and intensity of this effort is unprecedented, a reflection of their desperation. 1/

Over the next 60, those seeking to undermine our elections are going to ramp up the misinformation, using rumor, AI and misrepresentation to do so. The good news is we have a pretty good idea of what is coming and can prepare for it now. www.brennancenter.org/our-work/ana...

Five False Election Rumors to Watch For

Voters should expect recurring false election narratives to resurface in the coming months — and familiarize themselves with the facts.

brennancenter.org

• A handful of tips focused on foreign interference was spun into a 'massive operation' to steal an election. • Academic research was recast as the work of a “cutout” rather than the protected speech of researchers. • Federal capacity for countering actual foreign propaganda was gutted.

The “GEC Files” Don’t Show a Censorship Operation

The State Department promised proof of a vast censorship scheme. The documents Sarah Rogers released show something else entirely.

lawfaremedia.org

The job of an election official has become more stressful as false information about our elections has increased. You can support our elections by turning to trusted sources for accurate information. bit.ly/45Ri1rF

Behind the Scenes: How Elections Stay Secure

Across thousands of election jurisdictions, officials face rising scrutiny and a flood of misinformation - and they show up anyway. Here's an inside look at how they keep your vote secure.

youtube.com

As the midterms approach, we tested AI chatbots on election disinformation. Our research found they can challenge conspiracy theories — but they also enable users to generate deceptive election content. Here’s what we found: bit.ly/3TSPbV6

Does AI Fight or Fuel Election Disinformation?

As the midterms approach, our tests reveal that popular chatbots challenge conspiracy theories. Still, they offer users the ability to create deceitful images, audio, and video.

brennancenter.org

Brennan Center testing found AI chatbots couldn’t recognize images their own tools had made. Co-author @larrynorden.bsky.social: “They were uniformly bad at identifying if something was AI or not,” often “crediting images as photos being taken by real people.”

How AI Is Reshaping Election Information Ahead of the 2026 US Midterms

Justin Hendrix spoke to Larry Norden, vice president of the Elections and Government Program at the Brennan Center, about a new analysis of the subject.

techpolicy.press

Today, the Brennan Center releases a major study on AI and its potential impact on election disinformation in the midterms. Our months-long study produced some surprising results. Some good, some alarming. 🧵 www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...

Does AI Fight or Fuel Election Disinformation?

As the midterms approach, our tests reveal that popular chatbots challenge conspiracy theories. Still, they offer users the ability to create deceitful images, audio, and video.

brennancenter.org