it's Lazzie B! once again!! 😱

@lazzieb.bsky.social

Designer & Audio Director at @arbitrarymetric.bsky.social: Roman Sands, Paratopic. Dread Delusion💀 ADHD! NSFW maybe! Sound design, music, design. Transfeminist illegal girl. She/Her https://linktr.ee/lazzie_b Wishlist RoSa here! http://bit.ly/3AcBy9G

"Human beings are very good at telling the sex of somebody that they're talking to; we've evolved over thousands of years to be able to do that." Which is why, after thousands of years, we now require you and your good friends to legislate on this pressing issue—proportionately, of course.

Clarification: FWS ruling provides for trans men to -also- be barred from female facilities on account of their acquired 'masculine appearance or attributes.' As a corollary, trans women, tactily, do not acquire any female characteristics from transing their sex, so that's fun, eh? 👁️ 👁️

FWS vs Scottish Ministers UK Supreme Court Judgement April 2025, excerpt from the end of Paragraph 221:

males including males living in the female gender regardless of GRC status. Moreover, women living in the male gender could also be excluded under paragraph 28 without this amounting to gender reassignment discrimination. This might be considered  where reasonable objection is taken to their presence, for example, because the gender reassignment process has given them a masculine appearance or attributes to which reasonable objection might be taken in the context of the women-only service being provided. Their exclusion would amount to unlawful gender reassignment discrimination not sex discrimination absent this exception.
Toby Buckle@polphilpod.bsky.social · 10h ago

as i read the code, it seems to say 'it's just sex at birth', so in that case trans men use the women's but people won't want to do that, & would in practice get challenged for doing that, so it's *functionally* a ban on going out for trans & gender non-conforming people

when the revised code dropped a lot of lab mps where like "wait, how do services be trans inclusive if they want to?" &, like, they can't. that's the whole point this is what we've been trying to tell you for almost 2 years & you've been blithely ignoring us

& when you say "no, it means in the pub trans people can't use either men or women's toilets" there's this kinda blank stare you get the same thing describing republican policy in the simplest terms: people just don't believe you because it sounds nuts

& tbf, if you'd only caught the odd statement from labour or our purportedly liberal press, you'd think this is like, general trans-inclusion, but if a rape crisis centre wants to limit services to cis women, they can

i've found many cis people either: ▪️ don't know anything about this at all ▪️ or imagine it *allows* service providers to be trans-exclusionary, rather than *mandates* that & are only now catching up

Elizabeth Taylor@elizabethtaylor47.bsky.social · 12h ago

This is what we need to hear more of. And we need to forgive people when they say this. Better late than never - we need more people to speak up and speak louder however late they join the fight.

"Cuddly-honest" Andy Burnham & extremist transphobe Bridget Philippson think that, like most political decisions, their imposition of trans-segregation will quickly be forgotten. It will not. Margaret Thatcher proposed similar discrimination 40 years ago. Oppressive acts live long in memories.

Thatcher: "Kids are being taught that they have an inalienable right to be gay"

A court ruling in 2025 by the supreme court decided the govt couldn't have possibly meant precisely what the government said in a lot of detail when the act was originally published, an instead must have been interpreting the EA2010 as excluding trans people in most goods and services.

While I wish the collateral wasn't the key thing, it's going to disproportionately affect cis women. Concern is that taking this line just tilts the gun further towards mandatory digital ID as a 'solution' to the problem of 'firmly establishing legal sex' for every one of the headbangers.

Lee Hurley@hleehurley.com · 11h ago

Cis woman on now speaking about how much she has been challenged, had security called on her because she has PCOS. Says she's never had a problem with trans women but multiple problems with GC women. She's on the verge of tears.

The media's takeaway from an El-Sayed win is the same as it would have been from a Stevens win, and the same as it will be if El-Sayed wins the general, or if he loses it: everyone, no matter who they are, needs to take several steps to the right.

Well now we can move on to the part of the election where the centrist Democrats graciously accept their defeat and support the progressive primary winner for the good of party, state and country

I've already been pretty offline for a couple of weeks, but today & the next week or so especially is going to be an extraordinarily poor time to be reading comments and replies on UK news. Fallen down that pit twice this morning. The gloating is too much, man. Try to look after yourselves. 💜

Yeah, this is sadly common in nominal allyship without feminist analysis or deconstruction of misogyny itself. Sometimes they can undo the 'trans' part of their transmisogyny - by accepting their attraction - but they stop there. It's the most common presentation of trans-inclusivity from men.

Giselle 🏳️‍🌈 💜@gisellethe1337.bsky.social · yesterday

The way gamer men react to Suzi Hunter having done spicy content shows us that even the ones who supposedly support transgender people can be misogynistic. They're more than happy to put trans women into the same Madonna-Whore Complex as cis women.

Could be just me, but if you as an MP have based your, basically bs, "defence" of stripping trans individuals of rights to "protect women and girls" I wouldn't be out there vocally proclaiming how much you respect someone with domestic abuse allegations and a confirmed misogynist. Might be just me.