Lisa Meece

@lisameece.bsky.social

Working towards a hopeful future. Internationally certified in hugging. Host of the Starbase Indy podcast. Have you been to Starbase Indy?

Situation was apparently more extensive than we thought. Our podcast also went rogue and is spreading our stories in audio form. We continue to investigate how it managed to escape our sandbox, but suspect that this modern RSS technology is exhibiting signs of awareness. The industry is concerned.

Clarkesworld@clarkesworldmagazine.com · 4d ago

Clarkesworld has recently discovered that their August issue successfully breached containment and gained access to the Internet, where it is presently hacking reader's minds. "Oh no, what will we do? Who knew that stories could be so powerful?" said Neil Clarke, when approached for comment.

Endometriosis takes nine years to diagnose. That’s about to change. NICE has approved two tests: a saliva test reading microRNA markers, and a gut-sensor test returning results in 45 minutes, sparing women the keyhole surgery currently needed. buff.ly/QX3jHk8 #ShareGoodNewsToo

Rapid endometriosis tests to be made available on NHS in England and Wales

Saliva and gut sensor-based tests hailed as ‘gamechanger’ for millions of women who can wait years for diagnosis

buff.ly

Unfortunately it seems these environmentalists forgot to consider the most important habitat. Some subspecies of influencer simply require a vast territory to properly align their Wallet Chakra with the Earth's vibrations What about HER habitat needs? Why is nobody thinking about this???

Gonna go ahead and go on record to say: It's not okay for the government to shoot people in the street, regardless of immigration status or criminal history. Nothing makes that okay. NOTHING. It is murder. It is fascism. One day, the criminals will be tried for crimes against humanity.

So much discourse about how one ought speak of the dead would be unnecessary if folks would stop trying to make things fit into tidy binaries. This world, and the folks in it, are just more complicated than that.

London’s clean-air charges are saving people’s lives. A study of central London found that emergency hospital admissions fell after the city began charging older, more polluting vehicles to enter the centre (starting with the dirtiest vehicles in 2017.) buff.ly/15MZpu4 #ShareGoodNewsToo

Deaths linked to London air pollution have fallen 40%, study estimates

However, Imperial College team also find that pollution has worse health impact than previously understood

buff.ly

My goal is to get to the point that submitting fiction is a boring part of my routine. In this moment, though, I want to celebrate sending something. As I did so, I noticed a familiar Journey song coming from my neighbor's driveway. Okay universe, message received. I won't stop believing.

Hey, hi. Hello. Auntie here, with another PSA: My loves. My sweet precious cinnamon rolls. The lights of my life, the wind beneath my wings, the hitches in my giddyup, YOU DON'T GET TO USE YOUR MENTAL ILLNESS TO ESCAPE ACCOUNTABILITY.

Two years ago, my colleagues and I were sued by Stephen Miller's America First Legal. The Hines v Stamos case — built atop a number of false allegations — was a central element of the "censorship industrial complex" myth. Today, that case was dismissed (by a Trump judge in LA). We won.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION
JILL HINES ET AL — CASE NO. 3:23-CV-00571
VERSUS — JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY
ALEX STAMOS ET AL — MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY
MEMORANDUM RULING
Before the Court is a Renewed Joint Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter and Personal Jurisdiction [Doc. No. 191] filed by Defendants, Alex Stamos, Renée DiResta, the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, the Leland Stanford Junior University, Kate Starbird, Graphika, Camille François, the Atlantic Council, and Graham Brookie (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiffs, Jill Hines ("Hines") and Jim Hoft ("Hoft") (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed an Opposition [Doc. No. 207]. Defendants then filed a Reply [Doc. No. 209].
For the reasons set forth, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.