Lennart Wittkuhn

@lnnrtwttkhn.bsky.social

👨‍💻 Senior Specialist for Data & AI in the Public Sector | 🧠 Before: PostDoc in Computational Cognitive Neuroscience (Topics: Replay, Representations, Reproducibility) | 🏠 https://lennartwittkuhn.com

🚨Update: Our analysis of global APC expenditure has now been expanded to cover more publishers (7 -> 14) and more years (2019-2025). We estimate $15B in APCs paid over seven years, $3.7B in 2025 alone. Elsevier crosses the $1B threshold by itself in 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2608.16322 #ScholComm

Line chart showing 5 biggest publishers from 2019-2025
Eric Schares@eschares.bsky.social · 2y ago

🚨 Preprint! We combine our recent open dataset of #APC prices with the article counts per journal-year from #OpenAlex to estimate how much the academic community has paid in APCs over the last 5 years. A. $8.349 billion ($8.968 B in 2023 USD) $2.5B in 2023 alone. arxiv.org/abs/2407.16551 #metasci

Writing this story was so unbelievably fun. And not only bc @mcxfrank.bsky.social says quotes like this: “Kids’ experience looks really radically different than we thought ... They’ve got these little short arms, so the objects are, like, right in front of them. And they live in a forest of knees.”

Alison Gopnik@alisongopnik.bsky.social · last wk.

Good piece on why kids beat AI at learning, with Mike Frank and me. Behind a paywall but available elsewhere. www.technologyreview.com/2026/08/24/1...

I enjoyed writing this piece for The Transmitter. AI is a seismic change for science. What we make of it is up to us, but it’s a decision we can only make collectively. I hope more labs, and the field at large, will engage in finding a shared view of how we want to use AI.

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social · last wk.

With agentic AI’s rapid infiltration into science, researchers need to develop AI use policies and practices, writes @nicoschuck.bsky.social. #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/artificial-i...

The title is a little pointed, but I am very serious here. Academics, medical researchers, and other organisations should not collect data on birth sex. It is rarely relevant, and it almost always leads to privacy violations for transgender people. Please share. I would like people to read this one.

Separating sex and gender is statistical malpractice – Notes from a data witch

Statisticians and academics in Australia should ignore the terrible advice of most LGBTIQA+ organisations and read this post instead. The 2020 ABS standard is almost never the correct way to collect d...

blog.djnavarro.net

🧠 New preprint! How well can current algorithms *actually* detect neural "replay" in the human brain under absolutely optimal conditions? We built FASTIMAGES: A combined MEG + fMRI benchmark with KNOWN neural sequences, so replay-detection methods can finally be validated against a ground truth.

FASTIMAGES: Validating replay detection methods in human neuroimaging

A combined MEG + fMRI benchmark dataset with known neural sequences to validate replay detection methods (TDLM and SODA).

cimh-clinical-psychology.github.io

I thoroughly enjoyed giving this two-day workshop on Research Data Management @rtg2753.bsky.social @uni-hamburg.de ✨ Awesome to contribute to researchers’ structured training in #OpenScience 💪 Looking for a trainer? Check out my portfolio and get in touch: lennartwittkuhn.com/consulting.h...

RTG Emotional Learning and Memory@rtg2753.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Two workshops on better science for our RTG members. Dr. Lennart Wittkuhn on Research Data Management: organising data, DMPs, version control & BIDS @tinalonsdorf.bsky.social on Open Science: open data, pre-registration, registered reports & open access 🔗: www.emotionalmemory.de/news/open-sc...

@skjerns.de digs deeper into methods for non-invasive replay detection in human MEG and fMRI data. Check it out:

Nico Schuck@nicoschuck.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Interested in human replay and solid methods? Jointly with @skjerns.de we're releasing a benchmark dataset with known ground-truth neural sequences in MEG & fMRI, for developing & validating replay methods. First test: existing methods show similar effect sizes, but room to improve shorturl.at/6TgIr

Grading and googling hallucinated citations, as one does nowadays, and now that LLMs have been around for a while, I've discovered new horrors: hallucinated journals are now appearing in Google Scholar with dozens of citations bc so many people are citing these fake things

New(ish) paper! It's often said that hippocampal replay, which helps to build up a model of the world, is biased by reward. But the canonical temporal-difference learning requires updates proportional to reward-prediction error (RPE), not reward magnitude 1/4 rdcu.be/eRxNz

Post-learning replay of hippocampal-striatal activity is biased by reward-prediction signals

Nature Communications - It is unclear which aspects of experience shape sleep’s contributions to learning. Here, by combining neural recordings in rats with reinforcement learning, the...

rdcu.be

I recently discovered Conventional Comments (conventionalcomments.org) for providing a pseudo-standard set of labels for feedback and just tried it for an article review and it was really helpful to specify issues vs. thoughts vs. suggestions, etc. Hopefully it's helpful for the authors too!

We strongly suggest using the following labels:

praise:	Praises highlight something positive. Try to leave at least one of these comments per review. Do not leave false praise (which can actually be damaging). Do look for something to sincerely praise.
nitpick:	Nitpicks are trivial preference-based requests. These should be non-blocking by nature.
suggestion:	Suggestions propose improvements to the current subject. It’s important to be explicit and clear on what is being suggested and why it is an improvement. Consider using patches and the blocking or non-blocking decorations to further communicate your intent.
issue:	Issues highlight specific problems with the subject under review. These problems can be user-facing or behind the scenes. It is strongly recommended to pair this comment with a suggestion. If you are not sure if a problem exists or not, consider leaving a question.
todo:	TODO’s are small, trivial, but necessary changes. Distinguishing todo comments from issues: or suggestions: helps direct the reader’s attention to comments requiring more involvement.
question:	Questions are appropriate if you have a potential concern but are not quite sure if it’s relevant or not. Asking the author for clarification or investigation can lead to a quick resolution.
thought:	Thoughts represent an idea that popped up from reviewing. These comments are non-blocking by nature, but they are extremely valuable and can lead to more focused initiatives and mentoring opportunities.
chore:	Chores are simple tasks that must be done before the subject can be “officially” accepted. Usually, these comments reference some common process. Try to leave a link to the process description so that the reader knows how to resolve the chore.
note:	Notes are always non-blocking and simply highlight something the reader should take note of.

Introducing CorText: a framework that fuses brain data directly into a large language model, allowing for interactive neural readout using natural language. tl;dr: you can now chat with a brain scan 🧠💬 1/n

Bild

Do you know the secret to training and testing reliable cross-condition decoders in neural data? 🧠 🔍 Take part in this Kaggle challenge and win up to 1000$! 💸 Very cool idea by @skjerns.de! ✨

Simon Kern@skjerns.de · 10mo ago

How well do classifiers trained on visual activity actually transfer to non-visual reactivation? #Decoding studies often rely on training in one (visual) condition and applying it to another (e.g. rest-reactivation). However: How well does this work? Show us what makes it work and win up to 1000$!

🏡 🏳️‍🌈 ❤️ ☔ How to set up a transparent and supportive lab environment? I would love to hear from you, PIs postdocs, students! What are the things that work and that don't, what do you wish to have in place? Any examples of lab manuals? Comments, DMs or emails welcome (ondrej.zika@pm.me)