Lukas Slothuus

@lslothuus.bsky.social

Climate and energy politics | Postdoc at the University of Sussex researching fossil fuel phaseouts @suspol.bsky.social | Visiting Fellow at LSE | PhD in Politics from the University of Edinburgh | www.lukasslothuus.com

"In other words, if the fossil fuel industry does not fight tooth and nail against a phaseout policy, it might well be because it is already defanged from the outset. Ironically, perhaps the saving grace of fossil fuelled leadership is to sharpen the contradictions inherent in the fossil fuel...

Lukas Slothuus@lslothuus.bsky.social · 2mo ago

NEW ARTICLE: Denmark is often celebrated as a template for phasing out fossil fuels. Yet in this new article, I coin the term “fossil-fuelled leadership” to conceptualise a phenomenon where climate leadership on fossil fuels is twinned with continued extraction. link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Why would a country leave billions of dollars of oil & gas in the ground? On a narrow economic view it looks irrational: walking away from profit, jobs and geopolitical leverage, and picking a fight with one of the most powerful industries on earth. And yet it's happening🧵

Bild

Last year, a municipality in Denmark made bus travel free for everyone. What happened? Passenger numbers nearly doubled! The new government is now making all public transport (including trains) in the whole country will be made free for under 22 year olds: bit.ly/4vrkUtS

Bild

I wrote a piece for @tribunemagazine.bsky.social on the historic Santa Marta conference that addressed how, not if, to phase out fossil fuels. It named the problem, forged new alliances and drew attention to the legal and financial architectures that block phaseouts tribunemag.co.uk/2026/05/lett...

Letter From Santa Marta

Last month, representatives from dozens of countries gathered in Colombia to chart a path beyond fossil fuels. The event reflects a new climate politics taking shape across the Global South.

tribunemag.co.uk

I wrote a short piece for @theconversation.com explaining my research on Sweden's fossil fuel exploration+extraction ban, and how other non-producers can learn from it – and how this connects to the Santa Marta conference on the transition away from fossil fuels: theconversation.com/why-swedens-...

Why Sweden’s ban on fossil fuel production matters, despite not producing any itself – new research

The ban prevents future fossil fuel production in Sweden – but that’s just the start.

theconversation.com

In recent months there’s been a lot of talk about the ‘dark’ fleet, the ‘shadow’ or the ‘ghost’ fleet. For a while now I have felt that people use these terms without really examining their origins nor the assumptions that come with invoking them, so I wrote about why I think this is a problem:

Four Questions About the So-Called ‘Shadow’ Fleet

In recent months there’s been a lot of talk about the ‘dark’ fleet, or the ‘shadow’ or the ‘ghost’ fleet.

open.substack.com

NEW ARTICLE: How can fossil fuel non-producer contribute to the transition away from fossil fuels? 🇸🇪🛑Drawing on extensive interview data from my fieldwork in Sweden, I trace the political dynamics of Sweden’s 2022 fossil fuel exploration and extraction ban: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Symbolic wins as stepping stones toward material gains: Lessons from Sweden’s fossil fuel production ban

How and why do some countries without ongoing fossil fuel exploration and extraction decide to unilaterally ban such activities? As part of a global m…

sciencedirect.com

Following the price surge, the British right are pedalling a fantasy of self-sufficiency through North Sea oil. This has no serious basis in reality. Britain has been a net energy importer for 20 years. It has nothing to do with net zero and everything to do with decades of declining production🧵

Bild

The key players in North Sea oil and gas production decline and job losses haven't been government ministers or regulators. It's private companies who closed down fields and refineries as majors like BP and Shell exited and passed them on to smaller firms.

Fossil fuel stocks are exploding in response to the war on Iran. Who stands to benefit? The richest of the rich. Who stands to lose? All of us who have to pay higher prices for energy and a new round of sellers' inflation.

Bild

Nominally serious media outlets produce so much nonsense about Danish politics. They are full of factual errors. “Denmark” in the political discourse of other countries has become a phantasm to justify their rightwing policy demands. It has very little to do with empirical reality in the country.

Lukas Slothuus@lslothuus.bsky.social · 5mo ago

As an academic born and raised in Denmark who researches and writes about Danish politics, I can confidently say that Cowley has no idea what he’s talking about. The piece is full of factual errors and falsehoods

How do right-wing/far-right politicians politicise opposition to solar power and obstruct climate action? For @lseeuroppblog.bsky.social I explain the Denmark Democrats' success and how learning from community-owned wind power might reverse the backlash against solar blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2...

How a solar energy backlash engulfed Danish politics

Faced with a solar backlash led by the Denmark Democrats, Denmark must return to the community-led ownership models that defined its success with wind power.

blogs.lse.ac.uk

Like in Venezuela, the immense investments in fixed capital needed to extract a lot of Greenland's resources makes short term profit very difficult. Rather, it's about imperial ambitions. Interesting piece by @lslothuus.bsky.social

Lukas Slothuus@lslothuus.bsky.social · 7mo ago

It's imperialism, stupid! Natural resources are not the reason the US wants control over Greenland. I explain why in my new @theconversation.com article on Greenland's critical raw materials and fossil fuels in US expansionist ambition. Read the article here: theconversation.com/why-greenlan...

Spoke to The Independent on Trump’s threat of 25% tariffs on any country trading with Iran. It is economic warfare. This kind of erratic trade coercion raises the risk of doing business with the US, accelerates its isolation, and fuels global de-dollarisation www.independent.co.uk/news/world/m...

Why Trump’s sweeping 25% Iran tariffs have revived fears of global trade war

Experts have warned of global economic and political ramifications if the policy is implemented

independent.co.uk