Luca Fornaro

@lucafornaro.bsky.social

Researcher at CREi, working on international macroeconomics. https://crei.cat/people/fornaro/

Are public debts in the European Union sustainable? This recent article is a great introduction to this topic, I learned a lot by reading it. One thing that struck me is that debt sustainability analyses typically abstract from the impact of fiscal policy on productivity growth.

BildBild

How will tariffs affect innovation in the US and abroad? Shall the EU use tariffs to protect its high-tech industries? Should the rise in Chinese exports of high-tech goods worry the rest of the world? We tackle these issues in a new paper on Tariffs and Technological Hegemony.

Bild

Deeply honored to have participated in a panel at the @ecb.europa.eu Forum in Sintra. My remarks focused on the risk that high legacy debt may push part of the euro area into fiscal stagnation, and how a pro-growth approach to fiscal policy can mitigate this risk.

BildBildBildBild

New paper with Martin Wolf on Fiscal Stagnation. Key insights: 1) High public debt may push the economy into fiscal stagnation, a persistent state of low growth and high fiscal distortions. 2) Pro-growth policies are crucial to exit stagnation, but they require credibility.

Bild

Olivier Blanchard argues that we should understand better the macroeconomics of the medium run, and I could not agree more. Since I have been working on this for a while, let me show you why this is a promising field for young researchers!

BildBild

@lucafornaro.bsky.social argues that political constraint is a reflection of financial constraint, @michaelpettis.bsky.social that political constraint is a function of choices made by other political actors. It is not that international capital flows always restrict the domestic policy space...

Luca Fornaro@lucafornaro.bsky.social · last yr.

Very interesting thoughts, as usual, from @michaelpettis.bsky.social. But is it true that openness to international capital flows always restrict the domestic policy space? Capital inflows typically reduce the government's borrowing cost, which should increase the policy space.

Very interesting thoughts, as usual, from @michaelpettis.bsky.social. But is it true that openness to international capital flows always restrict the domestic policy space? Capital inflows typically reduce the government's borrowing cost, which should increase the policy space.

Michael Pettis@michaelpettis.bsky.social · last yr.

1/20 The views of Maurice Obstfeld (and other American economists) on the relationship between the internal and external accounts of the US are finally starting to evolve. www.brookings.edu/wp-content/u...

All of this points to downside growth risks. It's not necessarily a recession I'm worried about (although I am). Lower growth expectations reduces the incentive to invest in productivity-improving technology (see Benigno and Fornaro's work on Keynesian growth models) bsky.app/profile/pear...

George Pearkes@peark.es · last yr.

Agree with this. There’s a lot of downside to the 2023-2024 growth pace. Mechanically via lower immigration is a big part of it. But expectations can only carry that downside so far, so it’s talking about slow growth rather than a recession barring accelerating macro shocks from here.